Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes (2007, unknown): “Morphological decomposition has also been demonstrated in English (Andrews et al., 2004; Juhasz et al., 2003).”
Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words (2010, background): “…involving single word recognition, but such regressions occur frequently in natural reading, for a detailed discussion of relative merits of the lexical decision and eye-tracking experimental paradigms see, e.g., Andrews, Miller, and Rayner (2004); Frisson, Niswander-Klement, and Pollatsek (2008).”
Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds (2011, background): “…there are numerous findings which suggest that morphological decomposition routinely occurs during the processing of complex words (Andrews, 1986; Andrews et al., 2004; Hyönä & Pollatsek, 1998; Juhasz et al., 2003; Libben, 1998; Marslen-Wilson et al., 1994; Pollatsek & Hyönä, 2005; Pollatsek et…”
The role of age of acquisition and word frequency in reading: Evidence from eye fixation durations (2006, methodology): “This frequency effect is very robust and has even been used as a tool to study other processes such as whether compound words (farmhouse) are decomposed into their constituent lexemes (farm and house) during compound word recognition (eg, Andrews, Miller, & Rayner, 2004 ; Juhasz, Starr, Inhoff, & P”