Processing trade-offs in the reading of Dutch derived words

By Victor Kuperman, R. Bertram, R. Harald Baayen. 2010

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9f47caa2aa896168549f5fd0e99394cc2c8ca90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Hongbo Ji
2. T. Spalding
3. Christina L. Gagné

Citations in the corpus

• Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal (2013, unknown): “To put this issue in perspective via an example, Kuperman, Bertram, and Baayen (2010) include a total of eight main effects in an LME analysis of fixation durations in Dutch reading; for the interpretation of each main effect, the other seven may be thought of as serving as controls.”
• Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds (2011, background): “The latter theories vary in terms of the point at which the constituents’ representations become available (see Kuperman et al. (2010) for an excellent overview).”