Survival of the greenest: evolutionary economics and policies for energy innovation

By Jeroen van den Bergh, A. Faber, A. Idenburg, F. Oosterhuis. 2006

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be6491f7735a31dd9236cda2742b2bd992b09ac3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The co-evolutionary relationship between Energy Service Companies and the UK energy system: Implications for a low-carbon transition (2013, background): “…44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 13 This approach has helped to provide insight into how technological, industrial and economic coevolution has been responsible for shaping wide-scale, long-term socio-technical system change in the past (van den Bergh et al., 2006).”
Coevolutionary ecological economics (2010, background): “Bounded rationality, routinised behavior and choice through heuristics may offer better behavioral foundations for EE (van den Bergh et al., 2006).”
Optimal Diversity: Increasing Returns versus Recombinant Innovation (2008, background): “As a result, it is pretty sure that choices currently made in this area are not optimal from a long-term social welfare angle (van den Bergh et al. 2006, van den Bergh 2007).”
Branching points for transition pathways : assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future (2013, background): “…through the formation of a diverse range of alternative technological options, whilst ensuring that promising options benefit from sufficient increasing returns and learning effects to enable them to challenge the dominant technologies (Foray, 1997; van den Bergh et al., 2006, 2007; Gross, 2008).”
Models in evolutionary economics and environmental policy: Towards an evolutionary environmental economics (2009, background): “Environmental policies such as regulation or taxes can psychologically affect the intrinsicmotivations of consumers as the locus of control has shifted away from the consumer.”
The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption (2014, background): “…factors specific to EVs that could influence adoption rates including vehicle diversity i.e. the number of models that consumers can buy (Van den Bergh et al., 2006), local involvement i.e. the presence of a local manufacturing plant (IEA, 2013), and public visibility i.e. the number of years…”
Evolutionary thinking in environmental economics (2007, unknown): “This has been referred to as transition policy (Elzen et al., 2004; van den Bergh et al., 2006a,b) and it requires additional policies, notably innovation policy.”
Electrification Futures Study: Scenarios of Electric Technology Adoption and Power Consumption for the United States (2018, background): “Moreover, technology development can support clusters of related technologies (Grübler, Nakićenović, and Victor 1999; van den Bergh et al. 2006), such as batteries, electric vehicles, and grid-scale energy storage, or hydrogen fuel cells, electrolyzers, and storage systems.”