THE MANY FACES OF PREDATION: HOW INDUCTION, SELECTION, AND THINNING COMBINE TO ALTER PREY PHENOTYPES

By Rick A. Relyea. 2002

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/be3dfee64a55035c16f75df0fd8f862eb8269cbe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. Josh R Auld
2. Andrew Sih
3. M. Ferrari
4. A. Bell
5. D. Chivers
6. Grant E. Brown
7. T. Marchant
8. Xiaoxia Zhao

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. M. Ferrari
2. D. Chivers
3. Andrew Sih
4. Grant E. Brown
5. Josh R Auld
6. A. Bell
7. W. J. Resetarits
8. T. Marchant

In Global and Planetary Change

1. M. Ferrari
2. D. Chivers
3. Grant E. Brown
4. Josh R Auld
5. A. Bell
6. W. J. Resetarits
7. Andrew Sih
8. T. Marchant

Citations in the corpus

• Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk (2008, background): “Studies with tadpoles have shown that induced defences are weaker under low resource conditions (e.g. Relyea 2002a, b; Teplitsky et al. 2005).”
• COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES: CONSEQUENCES, CUES, AND CONNECTIONS TO PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY (2002, methodology): “Predator-induced tadpoles survive predation better but they grow more slowly when predators are absent (Smith and Van Buskirk 1995, McCollum and Van Buskirk 1996, McCollum and Leimberger 1997, Van Buskirk and Relyea 1998, Relyea 2001c, 2002a).”
• PREDATOR- AND COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE-OFFS (2005, background): “All of this leads to greater growth by competitor-induced tadpoles compared to uninduced tadpoles (Relyea 2002a).”
• Exposure to predation generates personality in threespined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). (2007, background): “…development of theory and a quantitative framework to explore the joint influence of correlational selection and correlational behavioural plasticity (e.g. Schlichting 1989; Stearns et al. 1991; DeWitt et al. 1999; Relyea 2002; Malausa et al. 2005; Parsons & Robinson 2006) should prove insightful.”
• Having the guts to compete: how intestinal plasticity explains costs of inducible defences (2004, methodology): “Further, intraspecific and interspecific competition have similar impacts on relative gut length (current study) and similar impacts on relative body length (Relyea 2002a).”
• LARVAL PERFORMANCE AND OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE ALONG A PREDATION GRADIENT (2004, background): “1d) results in a conservative estimate of fish effects, and other differences between zero- and one-fish pools may also partly reflect responses to dragonflies vs. fish (Relyea 2002).”