Having the guts to compete: how intestinal plasticity explains costs of inducible defences
By Rick A. Relyea, Josh R Auld. 2004
180 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9927326404bbe682e1385b46f60ff88c88078378
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Josh R Auld
- O. Kishida
- Kinya Nishimura
- G. Trussell
- A. Mougi
- Rick A. Relyea
- S. Peacor
- Scott F. Gilbert
In Genetics
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on aquatic communities (2008, unknown): “... were either foraging on periphyton that was higher up on the sides of the mesocosm (analogous to shallower water that would be less shaded by phytoplankton blooms), 2) wood frogs were able to sustain themselves on lower quality periphyton than leopard frogs (Schiesari 2006), or 3) wood frogs res”
- Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology (2009, background): “Although morphology is generally viewed as being less flexible, it is clear that multiple morphological traits can predators (Pfennig 1992; Relyea and Auld 2004).”
- PREDATOR- AND COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE-OFFS (2005, background): “However, the smaller body contains shorter intestines, thereby reducing foraging efficiency and growth (Van Buskirk 2002, Relyea 2003, Relyea and Auld 2004).”