COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY IN TADPOLES: CONSEQUENCES, CUES, AND CONNECTIONS TO PREDATOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY

By Rick A. Relyea. 2002

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85fac94a6826c82cb719ecd0237bb9b7149b8982

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Josh R Auld
2. Rick A. Relyea
3. O. Kishida
4. Kinya Nishimura
5. A. Agrawal
6. G. Trussell
7. A. Mougi
8. S. Peacor

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Josh R Auld
2. A. Agrawal
3. O. Kishida
4. Kinya Nishimura
5. G. Trussell
6. A. Mougi
7. Rick A. Relyea
8. S. Peacor

Citations in the corpus

• Future directions in the study of induced plant responses to herbivory (2005, background): “In animals, responses to competition frequently result in increased foraging activity, which increases prey susceptibility to predators (McPeek, 1996; Relyea, 2002).”
• THE MANY FACES OF PREDATION: HOW INDUCTION, SELECTION, AND THINNING COMBINE TO ALTER PREY PHENOTYPES (2002, methodology): “The changes in morphology associated with thinning (increased tail depth and decreased body volume) were similar to responses observed in wood frog tadpoles (Relyea 2002a).”
• Body shape, burst speed and escape behavior of larval anurans (2005, unknown): “Species which typically result in decreased activity rates and that inhabit short-lived breeding sites must maintain a poorer competitive abilities (Woodward 1983, Werner relatively high feeding rate to facilitate rapid growth, and Anholt 1993, Van Buskirk and Relyea 1998, Wisbecause delaying time t”
• Interactive effects of predators and a pesticide on aquatic communities (2008, unknown): “... 1) wood frogs were either foraging on periphyton that was higher up on the sides of the mesocosm (analogous to shallower water that would be less shaded by phytoplankton blooms), 2) wood frogs were able to sustain themselves on lower quality periphyton than leopard frogs (Schiesari 2006), or 3) ”
• Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology (2009, background): “…defenses in driving the evolution of geographic variation in prey phenotypes (Lively et al. 2000; Trussell 2000a,b; Trussell and Smith 2000; Relyea 2002a; Trussell and Nicklin 2002; Laurila et al. 2006; Kishida et al. 2007) and the genetic basis of morphological plasticity via quantitative…”
• Phenotypic modifications to conspecific density arising from predation risk assessment (2003, unknown): “Relyea (2002) reports a similar effect of density on wood frog (Rana syl6atica) behavior, in which a doubling of wood frog density caused a 50% increase in tadpole activity.”
• PREDATOR- AND COMPETITOR-INDUCED PLASTICITY: HOW CHANGES IN FORAGING MORPHOLOGY AFFECT PHENOTYPIC TRADE-OFFS (2005, background): “All of this leads to greater growth by competitor-induced tadpoles compared to uninduced tadpoles (Relyea 2002a).”