LARVAL PERFORMANCE AND OVIPOSITION SITE PREFERENCE ALONG A PREDATION GRADIENT

By Josef F. Rieger, C. Binckley, W. J. Resetarits. 2004

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Wetland Restoration for Amphibians: Should Local Sites Be Designed to Support Metapopulations or Patchy Populations? (2006, background): “In particular, gravid females may assess predation risk to their future offspring and avoid ovipositing in habitats of low quality (e.g., Petranka et al. 1994; Binckley & Resetarits 2002; Rieger et al. 2004).”
Ponds and pools as model systems in conservation biology, ecology and evolutionary biology (2005, background): “Their generation times are much longer, and they have terrestrial phases that allow a totally different pattern of dispersal, in which active habitat choice and homing behaviour may play an important role in structuring communities and populations (e.g. McPeek, 1989; Resetarits, 2001; Rieger et al.,”
Making habitat selection more “familiar”: a review (2011, background): “The ideal free model has been reported to predict habitat selection well in a variety of animals, especially at the landscape level (e.g., Hamback et al. 1998; Weidinger 2000; Beckmann and Berger 2003; Rieger et al. 2004).”
PREDATOR-INDUCED SHIFTS IN MOSQUITO OVIPOSITION SITE SELECTION: A META-ANALYSIS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR VECTOR CONTROL (2010, background): “, 2002; Binckley and Resetarits, 2005; Garcia and Mittelbach, 2008) and amphibians (see, e.g., Resetarits and Wilbur, 1989; Rieger et al., 2004) are able to detect the presence of potential aquatic predators of their offspring and avoid habitat patches”