Human Cognitive Abilities

By Patrick C. Kyllonen. 2015

193 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bd799ea6f93e19d21ac8584c0e92dd8b5333bd1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The power of play: The effects of Portal 2 and Lumosity on cognitive and noncognitive skills (2015, methodology): “Although the test is widely used as an intelligence test (e.g., Carroll, 1993; Snow, Kyllonen, & Marshelek, 1983), as Raven (2000) pointed out, the RPM focuses on two cognitive processes–eductive and reproductive skill.”
Genetics and Intelligence Differences: Five Special Findings (2014, unknown): “…precisely, general cognitive ability or g, as discovered and defined by Spearman in 1904 18 ) indexes this covariance, which accounts for about 40 per cent of the total variance when a battery of diverse cognitive tests is administered to a sample with a good range of cognitive ability 19, 20 .”
Adaptive n-back training does not improve fluid intelligence at the construct level: Gains on individual tests suggest that training may enhance visuospatial processing (2013, unknown): “, (Carroll, 1993, 2003;McGrew, 2009).”
The Operator 4.0: Human Cyber-Physical Systems & Adaptive Automation Towards Human-Automation Symbiosis Work Systems (2016, background): “A cognitive capability is the operator’s capacity and ability to undertake the mental tasks (e.g. perception, memory, reasoning, decision, motor response, etc.) needed for the job and under certain operational settings [31].”
Exploratory bifactor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Fifth Edition with the 16 primary and secondary subtests (2015, background): “Gorsuch (1983) and others (e.g. Brown, 2015; Carroll, 1993; Reise, 2012) indicated that EFA and CFA are complementary, and test users can have greater confidence in an instrument's structure when both procedures are in agreement, particularly when an instrument has been revised and reformulated.”