Multinational Firms, Innovation and Productivity
By Davide Castellani, Antonello Zanfei. 2006
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc954b96caf04123b5f8cb85bc14e2dfd7bfffef
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- J. Fagerberg
- Martin Srholec
- Camilla Lenzi
- B. Lundvall
- J. Scott‐Kennel
- Axèle Giroud
- Bjoern Jindra
- R. Capello
In Strategy and Management
- Axèle Giroud
- J. Scott‐Kennel
- J. Fagerberg
- Martin Srholec
- Bjoern Jindra
- Nigel Driffield
- Rajneesh Narula
- B. Lundvall
Citations in the corpus
- Infrastructure Endowment and Corporate Income Taxes as Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Central- and Eastern European Countries (2007, unknown): “From a host country perspective, certain empirical evidence points to a positive impact of FDI on economic growth and the possibility of spillover effects to local firms (e.g. Castellani and Zanfei 2006).”
- R&D Offshoring and the Productivity Growth of European Regions (2012, unknown): “7Eventually, innovation developed for the local markets may be decontextualized, becoming part of the knowledge base of the multinational firms, subsequently exploited elsewhere (Zanfei, 2000; Castellani and Zanfei, 2006).”
- Global Value Chains, National Innovation Systems and Economic Development (2018, background): “Several studies of such spillovers demonstrate, however, that the benefits are conditional on developing sufficient indigenous capabilities on the receiving end (Bell and Marin 2004, Castellani and Zanfei 2006, Criscuolo and Narula 2008, Narula 2014).”
- Territorial patterns of innovation: a taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe (2013, background): “Finally, in order to take into account the potential benefits that may accrue to each region i from the pool of innovations developed in other regions (innovation potential), we drew on the evidence that multinational corporations and FDIs can be considered as innovation diffusion channels and promo”
- MNE linkages in international business: A framework for analysis (2009, background): “Indirect spillovers result from demonstration effects, labour turnover and enhanced competition, and thereby affect the behaviour (Moran, 2001; Saggi, 2002) and performance of the domestic firms (Castellani & Zanfei, 2006: p. 142).”
- Subsidiary roles, vertical linkages and economic development: Lessons from transition economies (2009, background): “The results with regard to subsidiaries technological capability are in line with a recently emerging literature that emphasizes the importance of technological capability in foreign subsidiaries for positive knowledge externalities to domestic firms (Castellani & Zanfei, 2006; Marin & Bell, 2006).”
- Product and process innovation and firms' decision to export (2010, background): “Examples include Castellani and Zanfei (2006, 2007), Damijan et al. (2008), Griffith et al. (2006) and Mairesse and Mohnen (2004).”
- Collecting the Pieces of the FDI Knowledge Spillovers Puzzle (2008, background): “…the extent that local firms are explicitly hiring and paying former employees of multinational enterprise to provide training to their own employees, any subsequent productivity effect cannot be considered a knowledge spillover according to the defi-nition adopted here (Castellani and Zanfei 2006).”
- Does FDI Cause Development? The Ambiguity of the Evidence and Why it Matters (2012, background): “Different kinds of subsidiaries will provide different kinds of potential linkage and spillover effects (Lall and Narula 2004, Marin and Bell 2006, Jindra et al 2009, Castellani and Zanfei 2006, Narula and Dunning 2010).”