Consumer Preferences for Food Irradiation: How Favorable and Unfavorable Descriptions Affect Preferences for Irradiated Pork in Experimental Auctions

By John A. Fox, Dermot J. Hayes, Jason F. Shogren. 2002

294 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc67640d14a7086853033967d034e9e1d8fe25ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Charles N. Noussair
2. B. Ruffieux
3. Stéphane Robin

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Charles N. Noussair
2. B. Ruffieux
3. Ximing Wu
4. R. Nayga
5. Stéphane Robin
6. Charles R. Plott
7. Timothy N. Cason
8. A. Stenger

In General Decision Sciences

1. Charles N. Noussair
2. B. Ruffieux
3. R. Nayga
4. Stéphane Robin

Citations in the corpus

• Comparing Open-Ended Choice Experiments and Experimental Auctions: An Application to Golden Rice (2009, result): “This is consistent with the findings of earlier studies, such as Fox, Hayes, and Shogren (2002), who found that WTP for irradiated foods is affected by information in the same way.”
• Effects and Value of Verifiable Information in a Controversial Market: Evidence from Lab Auctions of Genetically Modified Food (2007, unknown): “Viscusi (1997) and Fox et al. (2002) concluded that individuals amplify the risks of a neoteric product and discount benefits.”
• Do Consumers Really Refuse to Buy Genetically Modified Food (2004, methodology): “See for example Anderson et al. (2000), Lin et al. (2001), Falk-Zepeda et al. (2000), Traxler et al. (2000), or Lence and Hayes (2001).”