Aerobic Exercise and Neurocognitive Performance: a Meta-Analytic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

By Patrick J. Smith, J. Blumenthal, Benson M. Hoffman, H. Cooper, Timothy A Strauman, Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer, Jeffrey N. Browndyke, A. Sherwood. Psychosomatic Medicine, 2010

1,564 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Objectives: To assess the effects of aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance. Although the effects of exercise on neurocognition have been the subject of several previous reviews and meta-analyses, they have been hampered by methodological shortcomings and are now outdated as a result of the recent publication of several large-scale, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review of RCTs examining the association between aerobic exercise training on neurocognitive performance between January 1966 and July 2009. Suitable studies were selected for inclusion according to the following criteria: randomized treatment allocation; mean age ≥18 years of age; duration of treatment >1 month; incorporated aerobic exercise components; supervised exercise training; the presence of a nonaerobic-exercise control group; and sufficient information to derive effect size data. Results: Twenty-nine studies met inclusion criteria and were included in our analyses, representing data from 2049 participants and 234 effect sizes. Individuals randomly assigned to receive aerobic exercise training demonstrated modest improvements in attention and processing speed (g = 0.158; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.055–0.260; p = .003), executive function (g = 0.123; 95% CI, 0.021–0.225; p = .018), and memory (g = 0.128; 95% CI, 0.015–0.241; p = .026). Conclusions: Aerobic exercise training is associated with modest improvements in attention and processing speed, executive function, and memory, although the effects of exercise on working memory are less consistent. Rigorous RCTs are needed with larger samples, appropriate controls, and longer follow-up periods. ITT = intention-to-treat; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc5d3edb1b8aba7f95419888d40bd6e269a37e6b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. Teresa Liu-Ambrose
  2. Louis Bherer
  3. Kirk I. Erickson
  4. F. Gomez-Pinilla
  5. Charles H. Hillman
  6. B. K. Pedersen
  7. E. Howie
  8. N. André

In Epidemiology

  1. M. C. Severinsen
  2. B. K. Pedersen
  3. Haiming Cao

In Psychiatry and Mental health

  1. Kirk I. Erickson
  2. B. K. Pedersen
  3. N. André
  4. M. Audiffren
  5. Agnes Flöel

Citations in the corpus