Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts.

By M. Press. 2007

209 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media (2015, background): “…existing misinformation on public debates that have widely agreed upon answers by the scientific community, which dissonance research has shown to be essential in maintaining misperceptions or beliefs outside of the mainstream (Festinger, Reicken, & Schachter, 1956; Tavris & Aronson, 2008).”
The Bright Side of Being Prosocial at Work, and the Dark Side, Too: A Review and Agenda for Research on Other-Oriented Motives, Behavior, and Impact in Organizations (2016, background): “…(Atran, 2003), prostitutes describing their services as therapeutic (Ashforth & Kreiner, 1999), and prosecuting attorneys insisting that they have rightfully protected society from criminals even when DNA evidence clearly demonstrates the innocence of people they jailed (Tavris & Aronson, 2008).”
See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media (2018, background): “Finally, social correction could also cause a backlash that strengthens misinformation beliefs due to a desire to avoid publically admitting a mistake (Tavris & Aronson, 2007).”