Academic Honesty and Online Courses
By Therese C. Grijalva, Clifford Nowell, Joe R. Kerkvliet. 2006
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bc076a674cd5e6416b1d6a1db8ef1502538d6bc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Roger W. Guyette
- Tony Mason
- Ada Gavrilovska
- C. Piotrowski
- James Lambrinos
- David A. Joyner
- Oskar Harmon
- Chula G. King
Citations in the corpus
- Online Exams and Cheating: An Empirical Analysis of Business Students' Views (2009, background): “For example, Grijalva, Nowell, and Kerkvliet (2006), in an empirical investigation, indicated that their evidence showed that academic dishonesty in online classes is no more pervasive than in traditional education.”
- Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? (2007, background): “Our purpose is to contribute useful information to instructors as they decide whether to administer proctored or unproctored assessments in their online courses.”
- Collaboration Versus Cheating: Reducing Code Plagiarism in an Online MS Computer Science Program (2018, background): “ programming courses decades ago [24]. While we still do not fully understand online-instruction dynamics, the available evidence suggests that plagiarism occurs in both online and in-person programs [4, 15, 25, 34, 41, 46, 54, 57]. While much of the prior work focused on undergraduate academic dish”