Plant reproductive susceptibility to habitat fragmentation: review and synthesis through a meta-analysis.

By R. Aguilar, L. Ashworth, L. Galetto, M. Aizen. Ecology Letters, 2006

1,019 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbf7df0ae3a2ee81dbedad64fe9044867f005aed

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The 'few winners and many losers' paradigm revisited: Emerging prospects for tropical forest biodiversity (2012, background): “As a result, trophic interactions in highly degraded tropical forests are often mainly comprised of generalist–generalist mutualisms (Aguilar et al., 2006).”
ECOLOGY OF ORGANISMS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS Urban drivers of plant-pollinator interactions (2015, background): “…the effects of land use change and fragmentation on pollinators (Winfree, Bartomeus & Cariveau 2011), on plant–pollinator interactions (Ferreira, Boscolo & Viana 2013) and on pollination (Aguilar et al. 2006), and the effects of invasions on plant–pollinator interactions (Morales & Traveset 2009).”
Why Reproductive Systems Matter for the Invasion Biology of Plants (2010, background): “…environments, including habitat fragmentation, competition between native and introduced species, and various facets of global climate change, infl uence plant reproduction (Aguilar et al. 2006 ; Aizen and V á zquez 2006 ; Traveset & Richardson 2006 ; Bjerknes et al. 2007 ; Memmott et al. 2007 ).”
Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. (2007, positive): “Self-incompatible plants, however, are much more likely to suffer reduced reproduction due to fragmentation (Aguilar et al. 2006).”
Evolutionary changes in plant reproductive traits following habitat fragmentation and their consequences for population fitness (2012, background): “…et al. 2002; Krauss, Steffan-Dewenter & Tscharntke 2003; González-Varo, Arroyo & Aparicio 2009), which can lead to significant pollen limitation through reduced pollen deposition or lower pollen quality (Ashman et al. 2004; Knight et al. 2005; Aguilar et al. 2006; Yang, Ferrari & Shea 2011).”
Tree invasions: a comparative test of the dominant hypotheses and functional traits (2011, result): “…of the weighted histogram of effect sizes of the raw data showed no depression around zero and the funnel plot of the effect sizes versus the sample size did not show skewness suggesting no publication bias in reporting results from the studies included in this meta-analysis (Aguilar et al. 2006).”
Disentangling the drivers of context‐dependent plant–animal interactions (2014, background): “…as the density and spatial aggregation of plant populations (Kunin 1993; Aizen & Feinsinger 1994; Agren 1996; Groom 1998; Wilcock & Jennings 1999; Aguilar et al. 2006), the identity of coflowering species (Groom 1998; Moeller 2004; Ghazoul 2006; Vamosi et al. 2006; Sargent & Ackerly 2008), and…”
Restoration of plant species and genetic diversity depends on landscape‐scale dispersal (2018, background): “…vectors and favorable matrix conditions between habitats or corridors for the movement of dispersal agents are among the most important prerequisites for restoring a functionally connected network of habitats (Aguilar et al. 2006; Donald & Evans 2006; Öckinger et al. 2012; Török & Helm 2017).”
How to be a specialist? Quantifying specialisation in pollination networks (2011, neutral): “While the evidence for specialisation-driven abundances is accumulating (Aguilar et al., 2006), the problem of over-interpretation is omnipresent without null model corrections (Vázquez and Aizen, 2006).”
Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. (2008, background): “…of population, community, and global change ecology, 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS which have traditionally focused separately on specific GEC drivers such as climate change (Walther et al. 2002), or on specific interactions such as animal-mediated pollination (Aguilar et al. 2006).”
Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants (2013, background): “Numerous studies have quantified the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on plant reproduction (reviewed in Aguilar et al., 2006), and a growing number of studies document the impact of land-use changes on pollinator communities (Winfree et al., 2011).”
Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. (2011, background): “2005), and habitat fragmentation has been found to negatively affect pollination and reproduction of wild plants (Aguilar et al. 2006).”
What do we know about the effects of landscape changes on plant–pollinator interaction networks? (2013, neutral): “Landscape modiﬁcations also affected cross-pollination and the sexual reproduction of plants largely due to reduced diversity and availability of pollinators (Parra-Tabla et al., 2000; Dick et al., 2003; Aguilar et al., 2006).”
Isolation from forest reduces pollination, seed predation and insect scavenging in Swiss farmland (2009, result): “This is in line with studies showing that reproductive output of plants is negatively affected by habitat fragmentation but these studies also recorded reduced pollinator activity in fragmented sites (Didham et al. 1996; Steffan-Dewenter and Tscharntke 1999; Aguilar et al. 2006 ).”
Low S‐allele numbers limit mate availability, reduce seed set and skew fitness in small populations of a self‐incompatible plant (2010, background): “Such changes may be especially important for SI species which are dependant on outcrossing for reproductive success (Aguilar et al. 2006).”