Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants
By N. Williams, R. Winfree. 2013
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3a0d677b3a798d5f754635d1e180b48f6764771
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Rachel Fordyce
- Katherine R. Urban‐Mead
- Maria T. van Dyke
- A. Espinoza
- Kingsley W. Dixon
- J. Scott Maclvor
- Philip W. Bateman
- S. McArt
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- ECOLOGY OF ORGANISMS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENTS Urban drivers of plant-pollinator interactions (2015, unknown): “…pollen limitation experiment done along a rural-to-urban gradient provided mixed support for this hypothesis, finding that declining forest fragment size reduced pollinator flower visitation, pollinator species richness and pollination in one but not another woodland herb (Williams & Winfree 2013).”
- The relative performance of sampling methods for native bees: an empirical test and review of the literature (2020, background): “Three other studies have used mobile gardens in urban areas with far greater success (Williams and Winfree 2013, Lowenstein et al. 2014, 2015).”
- Building height matters: nesting activity of bees and wasps on vegetated roofs (2016, background): “These radii are of similar dimension to other studies examining landscape factors on bee populations (Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2002; Sch€uepp et al. 2011; Williams & Winfree 2013).”
- Bees in the trees: Diverse spring fauna in temperate forest edge canopies (2021, background): “catch more bees in plots with less canopy cover and thus more light (Williams and Winfree 2013).”