Measuring knowledge spillovers in manufacturing and services: an empirical assessment of alternative approaches

By Ulrich Kaiser. 2002

230 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbc5f0deb619d2503b7781054a05c28cddc87063

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Firm innovation: The influence of R&D cooperation and the geography of human capital inputs (2008, background): “In most recent studies of the geography of innovation, analyses which emphasise the role played by local informal knowledge spillovers (Acs 2002; Kaiser 2002) have tended to predominate over human capital and labour mobility explanations.”
An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector (2002, unknown): “In a recent contribution, I (Kaiser, 1999) review frequently applied methods to proxy v and test them against each ij other.”
What do we know about geographical knowledge spillovers and regional growth?: A survey of the literature (2006, background): “KAISER (2002b) generalizes a model in the spirit of KAMIEN and ZANG (2000) by also taking into consideration that the degree of competition in the market for finished products supplied by the firms who may engage in R&D cooperation may indeed influence their willingness to cooperate.”
Innovation activities, use of appropriation instruments and absorptive capacity: Evidence from Spanish firms (2007, methodology): “Kaiser (2002b) uses proxy variables that summarise factors hampering innovative activity to measure spillover knowledge flows.”
Measuring Knowledge Spillovers: What Patents, Licenses and Publications Reveal About Innovation Diffusion (2009, background): “…survey data in order to assess the efﬁcacy of patent indicators (e.g., Acs and Audretsch, 1989; Duguet and MacGarvie, 2005; Jaffe et al., 2000; Kaiser, 2002; Scherer, 1983), technology licenses and publications have been E-mail address: ajnelson@uoregon.edu. underutilized as comparable…”
Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation (2008, methodology): “For previous studies using some of these indicators, see e.g. Evangelista (1999 and 2000), Veugelers and Cassiman (1999), Kaiser (2002), Mairesse and Mohnen (2002), Marsili and Verspagen (2002), Castellacci (2006) and Reichstein and Salter (2006). innovative mode.”
Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth (2007, background): “…matches therefore the one of the OECD-STAN and the LFS, reason why it has been possible to combine these various data sources together. constructing indicators of some of the main characteristics of sectoral technological regimes (Breschi et al., 2000; Marsili and Verspagen, 2002; Kaiser, 2002).”
Productivity spillovers from R&D, exports and FDI in China's manufacturing sector (2006, background): “There are several studies on spillovers generated by FDI in China, including Li et al. (2001), Liu et al.”
Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies (2005, unknown): “According to comparative study of various spillover measures by (2002) both uncentered correlation and direct customers). controlling for foreign and domestic groups, and dummies for the industry of the ﬁrm at the two-digit level.”
Measuring the Returns to R&D (2010, background): “Kaiser (2002) tests various ways of aggregating outside knowledge into a spillover construct on the assumption that horizontal (intra-industry) spillovers should be associated with high scores for horizontal sources of knowledge indicated by firms in innovation surveys (i.e. from competitors) and…”
Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities (2013, background): “Some inputs may seem costless (e.g., Kaiser, 2002) because they originate in venues such as open source communities (e.g., Fleming &Waguespack, 2007), patent disclosures, the popular press, trade journals, information exchanges at conferences, employee migration, or conversations around the…”