Scholarly Communities in Entrepreneurship Research: A Co–Citation Analysis

By Henri A. Schildt, Shaker A. Zahra, A. Sillanpää. 2006

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bae83e80e4b6702ac13c9ebfa34971ca3883418a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Social Entrepreneurship: An exploratory citation analysis (2013, background): “To date there have been few bibliometric studies in the field of entrepreneurship (e.g., Gregoire et al. 2006; Reader and Watkins 2006; Schildt et al. 2006; Dos Santos et al. 2011; Kraus et al. 2011), moreover in the field of Social Entrepreneurship, to the knowledge of the authors, only three…”
Entrepreneurship Research (1985–2009) and the Emergence of Opportunities (2014, methodology): “Finally, using Social Science Citation Index data from 2000 to 2004, Schildt et al. (2006) found multiple clusters of research topics emerging.”
Is There Conceptual Convergence in Entrepreneurship Research? A Co–Citation Analysis of Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1981–2004 (2006, result): “By and large, these clusters of conceptual convergence are consistent with clusters evidenced by Ratnatunga and Romano (1997), Reader and Watkins (2006), and Schildt, Zahra, and Sillanpää (2006), who all used different techniques and databases.”
Knowledge structure in international marketing: a multi-method bibliometric analysis (2012, methodology): “Based on the co-citation of the most frequently cited publications, a number of studies have analyzed intellectual structure in a variety of business disciplines (e.g., Hoffman and Holbrook 1993; Schildt et al. 2006).”
Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies? (2016, methodology): “Generally, bibliometric analysis is based on the notion hat bibliographic records, including citations, are useful gauges f scientific activity (Garfield et al., 1978), and has recently also ecome an accepted method of studying the scope and dynamics f scientific fields in Innovation Studies and Ent”
Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA (2015, methodology): “A large data sample of articles as used here avoids these possible “noise” (Schildt et al., 2006; Cawkell, 1976).”
Entrepreneurship and Family Firm Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of An Emerging Field* (2016, methodology): “Second, we have included both the generic term “Entrepreneur*” (Cornelius, Landström, and Persson 2006; Reader and Watkins 2006; Schildt, Zahra, and Sillanpää 2006) as well as “Ventur*” (Cornelius and Persson 2006; Cornelius, Landström, and Persson 2006), in order to incorporate in the analysis…”
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2015, unknown): “One distinct feature of Sitkis is that it implements a dense network subgrouping algorithm – a clustering procedure developed especially for bibliometric analysis (Schildt & Mattsson, 2006).”