Understanding Early Categorization: One Process or Two?

By Paul C. Quinn, Mark H. Johnson, Denis Mareschal, David H. Rakison, B. Younger. 2000

31 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Marc H. Bornstein
2. Martha E. Arterberry
3. Sabina Pauen
4. David H. Rakison
5. D. Poulin-Dubois
6. Timothy T. Rogers
7. Clay Mash
8. James L. McClelland

Citations in the corpus

• THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT CATEGORIZATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN: HIERARCHICAL INCLUSIVENESS, AGE, PERCEPTUAL ATTRIBUTE, AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES (2010, background): “This explanation is improbable with children older than 1 year (Quinn et al., 2000).”
• Evidence for knowledge-based category discrimination in infancy. (2002, background): “Despite such new developments, the general theoretical dissent regarding the nature of preverbal categories remains (see Mandler, 2000a; Quinn et al., 2000).”
• Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. (2001, background): “However, infants’ ability to make such “appropriate inferences” could be explained by perceptual matching to the target stimulus followed by imitation of the modeled action (see also Quinn et al., 2000).”