Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk

By Catherine C. Eckel, Philip J. Grossman. 2002

999 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b98869259f519deb7a0277a2d59afdf3268a6e67

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Arnaud Reynaud
2. Paolo Crosetto
3. Antonio Filippin
4. Stéphane Couture
5. Ellen Garbarino
6. Robert L. Slonim
7. Justin R. Sydnor
8. Manh Hung Nguyen

In General Decision Sciences

1. Arnaud Reynaud
2. Paolo Crosetto
3. Antonio Filippin
4. James J. Heckman
5. Catherine C. Eckel
6. Erik Snowberg
7. Glenn W. Harrison
8. Leeat Yariv

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Paolo Crosetto
2. Antonio Filippin
3. Tim Kautz
4. Angela L. Duckworth
5. James J. Heckman
6. Arnaud Reynaud
7. Thomas Buser
8. Thomas J. Dohmen

Citations in the corpus

• A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods (2013, positive): “The version of the EG task considered in this paper does not involve losses, strictly speaking, and in fact Eckel and Grossman (2008b) classify the task as ’gain only.”
• Gender differences in the contribution patterns of equity-crowdfunding investors (2017, positive): “2.1 Gender differences in risk taking for investing The literature in the psychology and behavioral economics has widely investigated gender-based behavioral differences (Eckel and Grossman 2002; Byrnes et al. 1999).”
• Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence (2008, background): “6 In addition to the issue of sex differences in risk preferences, Eckel and Grossman (2002, 2008) consider whether sex is taken to be a signal of risk preference.”
• Consistency of Higher Order Risk Preferences (2012, positive): “In particular, they apply the analysis from Eeckhoudt et al. (2009), but with the assumption that risk lovers prefer to combine “good with good” and “bad with bad.”
• Is trust a risky decision (2004, background): “Eckel and Grossman (2002)compare the scale with subjects’ decisions in an environment with financial stakes and find only a very weak relationship.”
• The “bomb” risk elicitation task (2013, neutral): “We also compare the BRET with three other popular tasks: the Multiple Price List à la Holt and Laury (2002), the Ordered Lottery Choice of Eckel and Grossman (2002) and the Investment Game introduced by Gneezy and Potters (1997).”