A Theoretical and Experimental Appraisal of Five Risk Elicitation Methods
By Paolo Crosetto, Antonio Filippin. 2013
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/01d700af03acaef19d55c1cb649c6ef2b7fa17c0
Citations in the corpus
- The “bomb” risk elicitation task (2013, unknown): “…the results of a large-scale experiment aimed at introducing and validating the Bomb Risk Elicitation Task (BRET), an intuitive procedure designed to 19For more details and to see the different way in which the tasks map choices into r see Crosetto and Filippin (2012). measure risk attitudes.”
- A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes (2016, unknown): “…outcome reporting bias is found in the HL replications, and the likely explanation for the low reporting rate is the fact that the task is performed only as a control, and therefore gender differences in risk preferences are of little interest to the authors (for details see Crosetto et al., 2013).”