Gender, Nature, and Nurture

By Richard A. Lippa. 2001

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b97ad26d1d26467b380b91497d5eaeb09f9add8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

Citations in the corpus

Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, STEM persistence, and gender differences. (2013, background): “Ma and Johnson (2008), for example, proposed that coursework in calculus during high school “is a powerful career filter that critically screens females for prestigious occupations” (p.”
Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants (2011, background): “In commonsense terms, a d of 0.20 may be statistically significant but the difference is not apparent to the casual observer; a d of 0.50 is noticeable to the average person; and a d of 0.80 or higher is quite obvious (Lippa 2002).”
The Relation Between Childhood Gender Nonconformity and Adult Masculinity–Femininity and Anxiety in Heterosexual and Homosexual Men and Women (2008, background): “F scales often have heterogeneous content, and thus the nature of the traits that are demonstrating stability is not clear (see Lippa 2001, 2005a).”
The moderating role of entrepreneurship education on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention (2016, positive): “According to the theory of social roles (Eagly et al. 2000), men and women perceive the world differently because of the socialization processes that begin in childhood (Lippa 2005).”
Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis. (2004, background): “A possible interpretation of these findings might be that women’s genetic predispositions are such as to maximize their satisfaction with their traditional adult roles and these predispositions are subsequently amplified by gender role socialization (Lippa, 2002; Maccoby, 2000; Ridley, 1993).”
Financial Attitudes and Family Communication About Students' Finances: The Role of Sex Differences (2007, background): “This finding supports socialization theories (Lippa, 2002) and the notion of different money tracks for sons and daughters.”
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review (2007, background): “In common sense terms, a d of 0.20 may be statistically significant but the difference is not apparent to the casual observer, a d of 0.50 is noticeable to the average person, and a d of 0.80 or higher is quite obvious (Lippa 2002).”
Work-Life Events Theory: Making Sense of Shock Events in Dual-Earner Couples (2019, background): “Men’s dominance reflects the socially constructed nature of gender roles, which children and adults are often socialized toaccept (Lippa, 2005;Tichenor, 2005).”
Biosocial Construction of Sex Differences and Similarities in Behavior (2012, positive): “In other research, people with gender-stereotypical vocational and leisure interests preferred hobbies and activities typical of their own sex (Lippa, 2005).”
High School Students’ Attitudes Towards Spiders: A cross‐cultural comparison (2010, background): “In commonsense terms, a d of 0.20 may be statistically significant but the difference is not apparent to the casual observer, a d of 0.50 is noticeable to the average person, and a d of 0.80 or higher is quite obvious (Lippa, 2002).”
How Women Cope: Being a Numerical Minority in a Male‐Dominated Profession (2011, background): “These challenges include men’s possibly greater aptitude for certain math skills (Hedges & Nowell, 1995, although see Hyde, Lindberg, Linn, Ellis, & Williams, 2008) and women’s preference to study people as opposed to men’s preference to study things (Lippa, 2005).”
The Evolution of Culturally-Variable Sex Differences: Men and Women Are Not Always Different, but When They Are…It Appears Not to Result from Patriarchy or Sex Role Socialization (2015, background): “…and Parental Investment Theory (Trivers 1972) suggest that, as mammals, men and women likely pursue somewhat different mating strategies and at least some of the adaptive design of men’s and women’s evolved mating psychologies will be robustly manifested across cultures (Lippa 2005; Schmitt 2005a).”