Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions: A Review

By H. Herzog. 2007

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Genetics, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d357a8978af4fd8ed13657f0583c653156e19e07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Attitudes toward Animals among Kindergarten Children: Species Preferences (2015, background): “Since gender is recognized as one of the most important demographic variables affecting attitudes and behavior toward animals (herzog 2007), gender effects on children’s responses were also assessed.”
Human-animal interactions, relationships and bonds: a review and analysis of the literature (2014, unknown): “…& Riley, 2005), Latino (Johnson & Meadows, 2002), Norwegian (Ellingsen, Zanella, Bjerkås, & Indrebø, 2010) or Hispanic (Schoenfeld-Tacher, Kogan, & Wright, 2011) pet owners, families (Westgarth et al., 2007), children (Daly & Morton, 2003, 2006), or males compared to females (Herzog, 2007).”
The Dark Triad and animal cruelty: Dark personalities, dark attitudes, and dark behaviors (2013, background): “Although a large amount of research exists examining demographic variables that may influence attitudes towards animals such as sex (Herzog, 2007) and occupation (Signal & Taylor, 2006), personality variables that may influence attitudes towards, and treatment of, animals are not well quantified…”
Moral Emotions and Social Activism: The Case of Animal Rights (2009, background): “Because differences between men and women been reported on both attitudes toward the use of animals (see review by Herzog, 2007) and disgust sensitivity (Haidt et al., 1994), sex was included as a covariate in the statistical analyses.”
Moral Disengagement in Harmful but Cherished Food Practices? An Exploration into the Case of Meat (2014, background): “…use of animals for human purposes, suggesting that although people tend to show concern for animal welfare, their concern diminishes as the perceived utility of that suffering for humans increases (e.g., Braithwaite and Braithwaite 1982; Herzog 2007; Knight and Barnett 2008; Knight et al. 2003).”
Preferences for infant facial features in pet dogs and cats (2011, unknown): “The measure of attachment also enabled us to assess whether there were sex differences in the strength of attachment (Herzog 2007) and between dog and cat owners (Zasloff 1996).”
The Relationship between Empathy, Perception of Pain and Attitudes toward Pets among Norwegian Dog Owners (2010, background): “Based on previous research, we expected to find differences in empathy, attitudes, and pain ratings based on gender (e.g., Herzog, Betchart and Pittman 1991; Robinson and Wise 2003; Herzog 2007), childhood pet keeping (Paul and Serpell 1993; Taylor and Signal 2005), human social connections (Epley e”
Gender Differences in Attitudes to Vegans/Vegetarians and Their Food Preferences, and Their Implications for Promoting Sustainable Dietary Patterns–A Systematic Review (2020, background): “In the general population, women have been found to be more concerned about animal rights [82] and ethics, representing around 75% of animal activists [83].”
Vegan men and hybrid masculinity (2018, background): “Compassion makes me courageous: rebellion through veganism Veganism is linked to women and femininity due to the stereotyped belief that women are inherently more nurturing and care more about animals (Adams, 1990; Gaarder, 2011; Herzog, 2007; Luke, 2007).”