Who Wants to be an Evolutionary Theorist?

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship (2004, background): “Aldrich (2001) notes that researchers often do not make explicit distinctions between event-driven and outcome-driven studies of organizational and entrepreneurial processes.”
Effectuation As Ineffectual? Applying the 3E Theory-Assessment Framework to a Proposed New Theory of Entrepreneurship (2015, methodology): “Examples include the use of a process-driven approach to understanding entrepreneurial activity (e.g., Aldrich, 2001; Aldrich & Martinez, 2001; Gartner, 1989; Low & MacMillan, 1988; Shaver & Scott, 1991), the contrast with causation (e.g., Polanyi, Arensberg, and Pearson’s [1957] contrast of…”
Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process (2013, background): “Other classic writing on the topic include: Mohr (1982), Aldrich (2001), Bruner (1986), and Poole et al. (2000).”
Grappling with the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2011, background): “In social sciences, there is a general distinction between variance and process explanations (Aldrich, 2001; Mohr, 1982; Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004).”