Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship

By Andrew H. Van de Ven, R. Engleman. 2004

303 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/42fd7226efe2b061a37e63a8b7ed0ecc5f6a099b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Internationalisation: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time (2005, methodology): “modate a variance approach as described by Van de Ven and Engleman (2004). Figure 1 represents entrepreneurship as proactive behaviour that results in innovation as a process, and as an outcome that implicitly has the potential to create value through separate exploitation.”
Exploring the Heart: Entrepreneurial Emotion is a Hot Topic (2012, methodology): “More appropriate methodologies may involve incorporating longitudinal data collection for multiple case studies (e.g., Haynie & Shepherd, 2011), event analysis (Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004), or experience sampling methodology (Uy, Foo, & Aguinis, 2010) in our empirical work.”
Scaling Social Impact: Building Sustainable Social Ventures at the Base-of-the-Pyramid (2014, methodology): “The narratives follow a clear sequence in time for each venture and its corresponding focal actors (cf. Van de Ven and Engleman 2004).”
Grappling with the Unbearable Elusiveness of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2011, background): “…each emphasizing the need to pay attention to context, unfolding process, and particular level of analysis (Aldrich, 2001; Aldrich & Martinez, 2001; Davidsson, 2004; Davidsson & Wiklund, 2001; Gartner, 1989; Low & MacMillan, 1988; Shaver & Scott, 1991; Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004).”
Power law distributions in entrepreneurship: : Implications for theory and research (2015, background): “…of venture capital funding, IPO (under)pricing, wealth creation, and other or combined indicators of “performance” or “success” (Davidsson, 2004; Delmar, et al., 2003; Garnsey, et al., 2006; Leitch, et al., 2010; Shepherd and Wiklund, 2009; Steffens, et al., 2009; Van de Ven and Engleman, 2004).”
Rethinking the Commercialization of Public Science: From Entrepreneurial Outcomes to Societal Impacts (2018, background): “…fields of research, including science commercialization and academic entrepreneurship, scholars emphasize the processual nature of the phenomena they study, yet variance approaches continue to dominate (McMullen & Dimov, 2013; Moroz & Hindle, 2012; Rasmussen, 2011; Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004).”
Internationalization Knowledge: What, Why, Where, and When? (2013, methodology): “We used a process-oriented research approach (Pettigrew 1992; Van de Ven 1992; Van de Ven and Engleman 2004) to investigate the role of different categories of IK as firms internationalize.”
Advancing Firm Growth Research: A Focus on Growth Mode Instead of Growth Rate (2010, background): “Recently, entrepreneurship scholars have called for a return to in-depth methods that look at process, such as narrative and case studies (e.g., Gartner, 2007; Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004), to better capture the in-depth thinking of entrepreneurs and decision makers.”
Time and the Entrepreneurial Journey: The Problems and Promise of Studying Entrepreneurship as a Process (2013, background): “Van de Ven and Engleman (2004) provide a comprehensive view of the nature, logic, and main differences between process and variance explanations / theories.”
Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives (2012, background): “Aldrich and Martinez (2001) distinguish between two major perspectives of process theory relevant to management studies: event-based and outcome-based processes (Van de Ven & Engleman, 2004).”