The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: sharing the laboratory life

By Fiona E. Murray. 2004

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b917b41ae261e98a2e732588a4927ed6805c0e42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis (2010, background): “As to ASUs, the network of social contacts of academic entrepreneurs in the public research sector is wider than that of the founders of other NTBFs, making ASUs more embedded within the scientific community ( Murray 2004 ).”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, unknown): “This factor is closely related to the degree of confidence achieved; hence, this is reflected in the greater frequency of interactions and longer-lasting links, which are particularly visible in the case of entrepreneurial firms (Murray 2004).”
The development, growth, and performance of university spin-offs: a critical review (2019, background): “Such “star scientists” are also more likely to be associated with growth-oriented USOs (Corolleur et al., 2004; Murray, 2004).”
Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners (2014, background): “Finally, projects with science-based partnerships may leverge academic networks in which the involved scientists are mbedded (Liebeskind et al., 1996; Murray, 2004).”
How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry (2006, background): “…highlighting not only the tacit knowledge regarding founding ideas (Zucker et al., 1998), which founders bring into a firm but also the social capital (Murray, 2004) and the professional networks on which firms rely for recruitment efforts (Casper and Murray, 2004; Casper et al., 2004; Jong, 2002).”
When birds of a feather don’t flock together: Different scientists and the roles they play in biotech R&D alliances (2013, background): “Prior work has focused on the roles of star scientists, academic scientists and university linkages (Fabrizio, 2009; Ding and Choi, 2011; Liebeskind et al., 1996; Murray, 2004; Zucker et al., 2002), whereas our research accounts for the varied roles of scientists within firms, who are increasingly e”
Careers and Clusters: Analyzing the Career Network Dynamic of Biotechnology Clusters (2005, background): “Broader research on the geographic origin of scientists, scientific advisory board members, and academic collaborators also documents the widespread geographic dispersion of social networks surrounding Munich biotech firms (Casper and Murray, 2004).”
Informal university technology transfer: a comparison between the United States and Germany (2010, background): “These measures are based on the argument that tenure serves as a signal and that more credentialed faculty will also be in higher demand by industry (Murray 2004).”
Knowledge Networks and Careers: Academic Scientists in Industry-University Links (2007, unknown): “Evidence based on the interviews, and also elsewhere (Murray 2004; Catherine et al 2004), suggests that renowned scientists typically retain their academic positions, while engaging in industrial ventures.”
SME international business models: the role of context and experience (2017, unknown): “In addition, their scientific networks can link these SMEs into foreign markets (Al-Laham & Souitaris, 2008; Delerue & Lejeune, 2012; Murray, 2004).”
Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science (2007, background): “Collegial networks are rich in opportunities for many faculty (Murray, 2004), including consulting, invitations to join SABs and licensees for patents.”
30 Years after Bayh-Dole: Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship (2011, unknown): “the influence of the department from which potential academic entrepreneurship emerges has attracted less attention (Murray, 2004; Bercovitz and Feldman, 2008).”
Harnessing University Entrepreneurship for Economic Growth (2013, background): “Conversely, faculty members with long academic careers and few interactions outside of the university typically lack the business acumen and experience needed to successfully manage a company (Franklin, Wright, & Lockett, 2001; Murray, 2004; Nicolaou & Birley, 2003; Radosevich, 1995).”