Security lapses and the omission of information security measures: A threat control model and empirical test

By Michael Workman, William H. Bommer, Detmar W. Straub Jr.. Computers in Human Behavior, 2008

603 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8e4300bba0f7f1fb4cb6cb599e968ef34fa2766

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Motivating IS security compliance: Insights from Habit and Protection Motivation Theory (2012, background): “Of the four papers dealing with this [4,7,13,22] none discussed Antecedent sources of Information or Rewards.”
The Impact of Organizational Commitment on Insiders’ Motivation to Protect Organizational Information Assets (2015, methodology): “Research beyond protective technology adoption has focused on isolated protective intentions or behaviors of adhering to organizational security rules and policies [40, 103]; practicing “safe computing practices” of backing up data [9], changing passwords, refusing to share passwords, scanning e-mai”
Understanding Security Behaviors in Personal Computer Usage: A Threat Avoidance Perspective (2010, neutral): “Workman et al. (2008) reveal that perceived vulnerability and severity both have an effect on user IT security behavior.”
Security awareness of computer users: A phishing threat avoidance perspective (2014, background): “…are imperative to cope up with cyber-threats such as phishing attacks (Anderson & Agarwal, 2006; Aytes & Terry, 2004; Liang & Xue, 2009; Ng and Rahim, 2005; Arachchilage & Love, 2013; Iacovos & Sasse, 2012; Purkait, 2012; Susan, Catherine, & Ritu, 2006; Woon et al., 2005; Workman et al., 2008).”
Beyond Deterrence: An Expanded View of Employee Computer Abuse (2013, background): “These studies have largely focused on the behavior of well-intentioned employees and examined factors which either hinder or facilitate compliance with security policies (Boss et al. 2009; Bulgurcu et al. 2010; Dodge et al. 2007; Herath and Rao 2009; Johnston and Warkentin 2010; Lee and Larsen 2009;”
Information systems security policy compliance: An empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition (2014, methodology): “[54] decomposed SCT into two main elements; i.”