Large Mammal Relative Abundance in Pithouse and Pueblo Period Archaeofaunas from Southwestern New Mexico: Resource Depression among the Mimbres-Mogollon?

By M. Cannon. 2000

174 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Ecology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b8d3e29eac912ee7c05ad453c06b5c11894a7335

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

In Ecology

In Paleontology

Citations in the corpus

Niche Construction Theory and Archaeology (2010, background): “As others have noted, niche construction could affect patterns of movement through resource depression, thereby influencing human population's rate of colonization (Cannon 2000; Broughton 2002; Broughton et al., this volume).”
Archaeofaunal Relative Abundance, Sample Size, and Statistical Methods (2001, methodology): “In analyses of trends in archaeofaunal relative abundance there is often an explicit hypothesis that is being evaluated; for instance, that the relative abundance of large mammals shows a decline through time, perhaps ultimately due to increasing rates of harvest by humans (e.g., Szuter & Bayham, 19”
The evolution of hominin diets : integrating approaches to the study of palaeolithic subsistence (2009, background): “Relative abundance indices provide instructive alternatives to diversity analyses by comparing the frequency of high- to low-ranked game groups to detect evidence for declining foraging efficiency (Winterhalder, 1981; Szuter and Bayham, 1989; Broughton, 1994; Madsen and Schmitt, 1998; Stiner et al.,”
Evolutionary Ecology, Resource Depression, and Niche Construction Theory: Applications to Central California Hunter-Gatherers and Mimbres-Mogollon Agriculturalists (2010, background): “Because of spatial environmental differences that are reflected in faunal assemblages (see Cannon 2000, 2001a; Shaffer and Schick 1995), Artiodactyl Index values derived from different sub-areas of the Mimbres region are examined separately; these values are presented in Tables 11, 12, and 13.”
The prey as patch model: optimal handling of resources with diminishing returns (2005, background): “Such nuances can potentially be identified using this perspective in concert with existing foraging models [13,14,45].”
The effects of resource depression on foraging efficiency, diet breadth, and patch use in southern New Zealand (2002, background): “If resource depression is lowering encounter rates during a single foraging bout, encounter rates may also be lowered between foraging bouts if sufficient regeneration time has not passed (Cannon, 2000).”
Dietary evenness, prey choice, and human–environment interactions (2004, unknown): “In this situation “net-catch” is the appropriate prey type, rather than the individual fish [9,25].”
Behavioral Ecology and Archaeology (2006, result): “Many subsequent studies of prehistoric diet change and, to a lesser extent, patterns in patch choice have led to similar inferences (e.g., Cannon, 2000; Edwards and O’Connell, 1995; Erlandson, 1991; Glassow and Wilcoxin, 1988; Grayson, 1991; Jones and Richman, 1995; Mannino and Thomas, 2002;…”
Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges (2007, background): “…and rationale grounded in Neodarwinian theory to interpret zooarchaeological assemblages (e.g., Bayham 1979, 1982; Broughton 1994a; Butler 2000; Cannon 2000; Byers and Broughton 2004; Lupo 1998, 2006; McGuire and Hildebrant 2005; Munro 2004; Nagaoka 2002a; Stiner et al. 2000; Szuter and Bayham…”
Prey spatial structure and behavior affect archaeological tests of optimal foraging models: Examples from the Emeryville Shellmound vertebrate fauna (2002, background): “Researchers investigating the effects of prehistoric resource depression on differential time allocation to resource patches have drawn on two separate models: Charnov’s (1976) marginal value theorem and Orians and Pearson’s (1979) central-place forager patch choice model (Broughton 1999; Cannon 200”
Did climatic seasonality control late Quaternary artiodactyl densities in western North America (2008, background): “However, for regions that currently experience a summer-wet pattern, such as the Southwest, Rocky Mountains, Great Plains, and southern Great Basin, the model suggests that increased summer insolation during the early Holocene enhanced the onshore pull of moisture from the Gulfs of California and Me”