The prey as patch model: optimal handling of resources with diminishing returns
By Oskar F. Burger, Marcus J. Hamilton, Robert S. Walker. 2005
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Anthropology, Ecology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/464f616b96ae5f182eb3d38ed56848354f02bc3f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Anthropology
In Ecology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Patch leaving in humans: can a generalist adapt its rules to dispersal of items across patches? (2008, background): “…of native peoples: when to leave one hunting or fishing ground, when to move herds to fresh pasture, when to cultivate a new patch of forest (Smith & Wishnie 2000), how far food is processed before carrying it home (Metcalfe & Barlow 1992) and how much a carcass is butchered (Burger et al. 2005).”
- Is it Intensification Yet? Current Archaeological Perspectives on the Evolution of Hunter-Gatherer Economies (2015, background): “Burger et al. (2005) take this logic one step further, developing a ‘‘prey as patch model’’ derived from Charnov’s (1976) marginal value theorem.”
- The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource diversity, intensification, and an alternative to optimal foraging explanations (2012, background): “There are, however, two other OFT models – patch choice and central place models, that appear to offer ways of rationalizing the mismatch between diet breadth model predictions and empirical reality (Burger et al., 2005; Smith, 1983; Winterhalder and Kennett, 2006).”
- Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges (2007, background): “Burger et al. (2005) suggest that the patch choice model as applied at singlecarcass levels can predict selective part processing.”