Dietary evenness, prey choice, and human–environment interactions

By E. Jones. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Early Paleoindian foraging: examining the faunal evidence for large mammal specialization and regional variability in prey choice (2004, background): “…diets than generalists, and the degree to which assemblages are dominated by the bones of large mammals, a characteristic that can be measured in several ways (e.g., Broughton, 1994; Mellars, 1996; Grayson and Delpech, 1998, 2002; Grayson et al., 2001; Waguespack and Surovell, 2003; Jones, 2004).”
Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges (2007, background): “Extremely large-bodied prey such as whales or some pinnipeds often have excessive handling costs that depress their rank relative to overall body size (e.g., Byers and Ugan 2005; Jones 2004; Smith 1991).”
Prey Body Size and Ranking in Zooarchaeology: Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Applications from the Northern Great Basin (2011, background): “…and warfare, social inequalities, settlement systems, material display, and human health (e.g., Bird and O'Connell 2006; Broughton and O'Connell 1999; Broughton et al. 2010; Cannon 2003; Fitzhugh 2003; Jones and Raab 2004; Kennett 2005; Kuhn et al. 2001 ;Morin 2004, 2010; Ugan et al. 2003).”