Evolutionary Foraging Models in Zooarchaeological Analysis: Recent Applications and Future Challenges

By K. Lupo. 2007

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evolutionary Ecology, Resource Depression, and Niche Construction Theory: Applications to Central California Hunter-Gatherers and Mimbres-Mogollon Agriculturalists (2010, background): “Analyses of prehistoric resource depression thus have far-reaching implications, and consequently, they represent one of the better developed areas in the archaeological application of EE (see reviews in Broughton 2002, 2004a, b; Grayson 2001; Lupo 2007).”
When bigger is not better: The economics of hunting megafauna and its implications for Plio-Pleistocene hunter-gatherers (2016, background): “These modifications include but are not limited to considering alternate currencies such as social and political gains (see Lupo, 2007).”
Evolution in Archaeology (2008, background): “…the range of options available, the currency in terms of which they will be evaluated, and therefore by implication the relevant goals of the people concerned, as well as constraints that affect the payoffs (Bird & O’Connell 2006, p. 5; Lupo 2007, p. 146; Winterhalder & Kennett 2006, pp. 13– 14).”
The Broad Spectrum Revolution at 40: Resource diversity, intensification, and an alternative to optimal foraging explanations (2012, background): “Lupo, for example, defines intensification as a: ‘‘process whereby total productivity per unit of land is increased, but at increasing costs to the individual resulting in a decline in foraging efficiency’’ (Lupo, 2007, p. 160).”