Associations of trait and ability emotional intelligence with performance on Theory of Mind tasks in an adult sample

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. (2017, background): “…suggests that readers of different types of fiction (e.g., literary, thriller, romance) differ in certain Big Five personality traits (Kraaykamp & Van Eijk, 2005; Michelson, 2014), these personality traits are not clearly related to RMET performance (Ferguson & Austin, 2010; Nettle & Liddle, 2008).”
Trait Emotional Intelligence and the Big Five (2012, background): “…evidence that trait EI is a useful concept that predicts a host of meaningful criteria over and above the basic dimensions of personality (e.g., Ferguson & Austin, 2010; Kreifelts, Ethofer, Huberle, Grodd, & Wildgruber, 2010; Laborde, Dosseville, & Scelles, 2010; Mikolajczak, Petrides, &…”
The Validity of the MSCEIT: Additional Analyses and Evidence (2012, background): “The factor structures of the STEM and STEU are complex, which may help explain why the STEM correlated more highly with MSCEIT understanding, r = .40, than with the management branch (Ferguson & Austin, 2010).”
Trait emotional intelligence as a predictor of socioemotional outcomes in early adolescence (2012, methodology): “It is conceptually distinct from ability EI (see Austin, 2009; Ferguson & Austin, 2010), which – in theory – comprises actual emotion-related abilities and should be measured via maximum-performance tests similar to those used in the operationalization of standard cognitive ability.”