Towards an understanding of inequity

By Adams Js. 1963

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

How Do Fairness Definitions Fare?: Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairness (2018, methodology): “re sensitive to the prevailing notions of fairness in society. Definitions of Fairness Broadly, we investigate a concept of fairness known as distributive justice, or fairness regarding the outcomes (Adams, 1963; 1965). However, which characteristics regarding the individual should be relevant and w”
The Future of Work Motivation Theory (2004, unknown): “Adams (1963), for exam”
Inequity at work: Its measurement and association with worker health (2002, methodology): “In Adams’ (1965) seminal paper, this principle is expressed in terms of the ratios of the investments and outcomes of one party and those of the other party, respectively.”
Understanding Employee Motivation and Organizational Performance: Arguments for a Set-Theoretic Approach (2016, background): “(Maslow, 1943), expectancy theory (Vroom, 1964), equity theory (Adams, 1963), goal setting (Locke & Latham, 1990), cognitive evaluation theory (Deci, 1971), work design (Hackman”
The influence of emotions on customer's cognitive evaluations and satisfaction in a service failure and recovery context (2008, background): “The concept of perceived justice has its origins in the social exchange theory (Adams, 1965 ; Blau, 1964 ), which argues that individuals assess the equity of an exchange by comparing their ratio of outcomes to investments to the ratio for others in the exchange relationship (Adams, 1963 ).”
Introduction to special topic forum: The future of work motivation theory. (2004, background): “Adams (1963), for example, introduced equity theory to explain how employees respond both cognitively and behaviorally to perceived unfairness in the workplace (see also Mowday & Colwell, 2003, and Weick, Bougon, & Maruyama, 1976).”
The Effects of Performance Rating, Leader–Member Exchange, Perceived Utility, and Organizational Justice on Performance Appraisal Satisfaction: Applying a Moral Judgment Perspective (2014, background): “Originally couched in terms of fairness and equity (Adams 1963; Greenberg 1986), a number of distinct types of organizational justice have now been proposed.”