The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement.

By D. Stokols, Kara L. Hall, B. Taylor, Richard P. Moser. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008

774 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Information Systems and Management, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad90d34fb51f99214e55a5b1f0b04ecebaf99808

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

In Information Systems and Management

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science (2015, background): “Finally, the science of team science field is concerned with not only research but also translation of the research to improve practice (Spaapen and Dijstebloem, 2005; Stokols et al., 2008a).”
Ties That Last (2013, background): “Should this be accomplished, sustained interdisciplinary collaborations may have their proclaimed returns (Stokols et al., 2008).”
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact (2013, background): “Current interest in team science and how scientists search for ideas is premised in part on the idea that teams can span scientific specialties, effectively combining knowledge that prompts scientific breakthroughs (11-15).”
Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research (2014, background): “Evaluation is also embedded in overlapping spheres of influence, from local considerations, institutional needs and regional issues that influence the knowledge exchange and focus of evaluations (Stokols et al., 2008).”
Facilitating Innovation in Diverse Science Teams Through Integrative Capacity (2012, background): “In the study of science teams, researchers note the importance of operating norms, which encourage open communication, respect, inclusiveness, and shared decision making (Stokols et al., 2008b).”
Creating and maintaining high-performing collaborative research teams: the importance of diversity and interpersonal skills (2014, methodology): “Knowledge from emerging disciplines, such as the “science of team science” (Stokols et al. 2008a), can be used as part of those training projects.”
Tracking the evolution of waste recycling research using overlay maps of science. (2011, background): “’ (SciTS) community, which has developed ‘an amalgam of conceptual and methodological strategies aimed at understanding and enhancing the outcomes of large-scale collaborative research and training’ (Stokols et al., 2008. p. S77; Börner et al., 2010). 6 That evaluation of IDR is problematic is not a”
Creativity in scientific teams: : Unpacking novelty and impact (2015, background): “Furthermore, it suggests the possibility for managerial or policy interventions that would encourage the development of some aspects of scientific teams while attempting to limit the presence of less desirable characteristics (Falk-Krzesinski et al., 2010; Fiore, 2008; Stokols et al., 2008).”
Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital☆ (2010, background): “…including for assessment of R&D organizations (Geisler, 1994).3 Changes in the publication patterns of scientists, particularly ones triggered (whether deliberately or not) by new institutions, are of great interest to science policy makers (National Academy of Science, 2007; Stokols et al., 2008).”