Influencing scientists’ collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital☆

By Branco Leonidov Ponomariov, Paul Craig Boardman. 2010

226 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/255bdc94ebbf56b8d7ea5ffaf85b37e9288ca00d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Christoph Grimpe
2. Heide Loehlein Fier
3. Heather Rimes
4. Jan L. Youtie
5. K. Hussinger
6. J. Edler
7. Taryn Stanko
8. Christine M. Beckman

In Statistics and Probability

1. Christoph Grimpe
2. Heide Loehlein Fier
3. J. Edler
4. Taryn Stanko
5. K. Hussinger
6. Christine M. Beckman
7. Barry Bozeman
8. Erin Leahey

In Strategy and Management

1. Christoph Grimpe
2. Heide Loehlein Fier
3. Jan L. Youtie
4. Heather Rimes
5. J. Edler
6. K. Hussinger
7. Taryn Stanko
8. Christine M. Beckman

Citations in the corpus

• Prominent but Less Productive (2015, methodology): “Ponomariov, 2008) and interdisciplinary research (Ponomariov and Boardman, 2010), we empirically assessed the representativeness of our sample by comparing it with the population of scientists (captured in NSF’s Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System, SESTAT) and the population of papers (”
• The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model (2015, background): “…of scientists, engineers and knowledge users depend upon the conjoining of equipment, material resources, organizational and institutional arrangements for work, and the unique human capital embodied in individuals (Dietz and Bozeman, 2005; Rigby and Edler, 2005; Ponomariov and Boardman, 2010).”
• International Scientist Mobility and the Locus of Knowledge and Technology Transfer (2011, methodology): “Proponents of the scientific and technical human capital approach have argued that “social capital begets human capital” (Ponomariov and Boardman, 2010: 616).”
• Formal and Informal Knowledge and Technology Transfer from Academia to Industry: Complementarity Effects and Innovation Performance (2013, methodology): “Another theoretical approach which adopts the perspective of the individual scientist and that may consequently help explaining formal and informal modes of transfer is the scientific and technical human capital approach (Bozeman and Corley, 2004; Ponomariov and Boardman, 2010).”