Functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward prediction

By Brian Knutson, Jeffrey C. Cooper. Current Opinion in Neurology, 2005

764 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b79d8905d2b1093ad43ec02705c8860a9c0f5310

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value (2013, neutral): “org), (2) work cited in review papers (e.g., Grabenhorst and Rolls, 2011; Kable and Glimcher, 2009; Knutson and Cooper, 2005; O'Doherty, 2004; Peters and Büchel, 2010); (3) existing in-house reference libraries, and (4) direct searches on the names of frequently occurring authors.”
How the brain integrates costs and benefits during decision making (2010, methodology): “At the brain level, we hypothesized that the decision process involves separate representations of expected reward and loss, in the ventral striatum (1) and amygdala (14, 15), respectively, from which a comparison signal is computed.”
Dissociable neural representations of future reward magnitude and delay during temporal discounting (2009, positive): “…findings indicate that activity in the NAcc, MPFC, and PCC increases with larger magnitudes of a future reward, and so align with a substantial body of research implicating mesolimbic circuits in representing the magnitude of anticipated rewards (Knutson et al., 2001; Knutson and Cooper, 2005 ).”
Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. (2007, background): “This general question imp l es a host of other impo rtant questions such as: Is self-interest a primary mo tive that needs to be constrai ned by appropria te inhibitory machinery? If so, which brain ci r uitry is involved in these inhibitory processes? To what extent are these processes rela ted to ”
Reduced Caudate and Nucleus Accumbens Response to Rewards in Unmedicated Subjects with Major Depressive Disorder (2009, background): “Given the role of dopamine and the basal ganglia in reward anticipation (22), we predicted that depressed individuals would show blunted responses to reward cues, particularly in the ventral striatum.”
Empathy: A Social Cognitive Neuroscience Approach (2009, background): “One straightforward prediction would be to observe neural overlap between self and other for reward in the ventral striatum (Knutson & Cooper, 2005).”
A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. (2007, background): “activation in dopaminergic areas increases in response to cues that signal opportunities to perform rewarded responses (see Knutson & Cooper, 2005 ).”
Internet Gaming Addiction: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research (2012, background): “associated with substance-related addictions (Kalivas and Volkow 2005; Knutson and Cooper 2005).”
Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards (2010, positive): “This implicates the NAcc as a universal mediator of reward prediction (Knutson and Cooper, 2005).”
Anticipatory affect: neural correlates and consequences for choice (2008, neutral): “anticipation versus outcome; figure 3 )( Knutson & Cooper 2005 ).”
Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop signal task (2008, background): “Although the caudate nucleus is also an input nucleus of the basal ganglia, it appears to assume a greater role in higher cortical functions than motor control, compared to the putamen (Afifi, 2003; Carbon and Marié, 2003; Poldrack, 2002; Hikosaka, 2007; Knutson and Cooper, 2005).”
Neurobiological Mechanisms of the Placebo Effect (2005, background): “Furthermore, this change pattern was not seen at 6 weeks when the antidepressant response was well established, consistent with differential patterns of activity with expectation and delivery of reward in animal models (Schultz et al., 2000; Knutson and Cooper, 2005).”
Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Human Cingulate Cortex and Its Relation to Functional Specialization (2009, neutral): “…that focused on reward expectation and often using computationally derived regressors to estimate subjects’ reward expectations (Tanaka et al., 2004; Knutson and Cooper, 2005; Reuter et al., 2005; Daw and Doya, 2006; Hampton et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2006; Rolls et al., 2008) revealed the…”
Dysfunction of reward processing correlates with alcohol craving in detoxified alcoholics (2007, background): “…reward-indicating cues increase ventral striatal (including the nucleus accumbens) oxygenation (hereafter, " activation " ) in healthy volunteers (Aharon et al., www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg NeuroImage 35 (2007) 787 – 794 2001; Breiter et al., 2001; Knutson et al., 2001b; Stark et al., 2005).”
Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation (2010, neutral): “Here, research generally differentiates between anticipated reward (i.e., in the striatum) and reward outcome (i.e., in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex) (Knutson & Cooper, 2005).”