Prisoner Reentry: Current Trends, Practices, and Issues

By James Austin. 2001

127 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b74a51f607a12b4d37e5182696b404a18145359d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. M. Bodkin
2. M. Delisi
3. Terri A. Winnick
4. Travis C. Pratt
5. Shadd Maruna

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Delisi
2. Andy Hochstetler
3. Edward J. Latessa
4. Christopher T. Lowenkamp
5. Travis C. Pratt
6. P. Smith
7. Jennifer A. Pealer
8. M. Bodkin

Citations in the corpus

• Social Support and Feelings of Hostility Among Released Inmates (2010, background): “Whereas criminologists once narrowly focused on the recidivism rates of paroled offenders, the reentry paradigm is a multifaceted look at the relationship between offenders and society and the processes that both enable successful rehabilitation and desistance from crime and facilitate continued inv”
• Anticipated Stigma and Stigma Management Among Those to be Labeled “Ex-con” (2008, background): “Scholars are, however, beginning to explore in depth the nuances of prisoner reentry (Austin 2001 ; Clear et al.”
• Drawing Blood from Stones: Legal Debt and Social Inequality in the Contemporary United States1 (2010, background): “…that people with a criminal conviction are at high risk of reoffending and that rearrest and reincarceration reproduce poverty (Hagan and Dinovitzer 1999; Austin 2001; Hagan and Coleman 2001; Travis and Petersilia 2001; Roberts 2004; Council of State Governments 2005; Travis 2005; Clear 2007).”
• Adhering to the Risk and Need Principles: Does It Matter for Supervision-Based Programs? (2006, background): “It may also be due to greater numbers of low-risk offenders going to prison instead of probation; mere changes in revocation practices due to overcrowded prisons have also been cited (Austin 2001; Seiter 2002).”
• Welcome Home? Examining the Reentry Court Concept from a Strengths-Based Perspective (2003, background): “This description unfortunately makes the new reentry court initiative sound suspiciously like “simply another word for parole supervision, which many have tried to discredit and dismantle” (Austin 2001:314).”
• Time to Prison Return for Offenders With Serious Mental Illness Released From Prison (2010, background): “%) will return to the community (Austin, 2001; Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2001), where adequacy of treatment and continuity of care are also problematic (Freudenberg, 2003; Hammett, Roberts, & Kennedy, 2001; Harrison, 2001; Kupers, 2000; Lamb et al., 1999; Regan & Alderson, 2001).”