Welcome Home? Examining the Reentry Court Concept from a Strengths-Based Perspective

By Shadd Maruna. 2003

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9a673ace30c7a032815ea2e579ad0639a25def70

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions † (2006, background): “Active responsibility is future oriented and forward thinking, focusing on what needs to be done in order to make good or make amends or make it right (see Maruna & LeBel, 2003).”
Recovery and desistance: what the emerging recovery movement in the alcohol and drug area can learn from models of desistance from offending (2017, unknown): “While practical support with jobs and housing are important, developing hope and agency in individuals is vital – thus involving the identification of realistic and attainable life changing opportunities, supervision to support and develop these capacities (Maruna & LeBel 2003).”
Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass (2004, background): “Of course, rewarding positive achievements is rare in the criminal justice system, which is most comfortable with the role of detecting and punishing offences (but see Maruna and LeBel, 2003 ).”
Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective (2012, background): “Supervision needs to support and develop these capacities (Maruna and LeBel, 2003).”
Reentry and Renegotiating Motherhood (2009, background): “Maruna and LeBel (2003) suggest a strength-based narrative that focuses on strengthening the positive aspects of an offender’s situation with an emphasis on the contributions that the individual can make to society, encouraging offenders to recast their personal narratives so that they see…”
If One Doesn’t Get You Another One Will (2012, background): “…the stigma of incarceration may be an important dimension in “successful” prisoner reintegration (see for example, Hirschfield & Piquero, 2010; Maruna & LeBel, 2003; Rose & Clear, 2003), quantitative research on this subject is scarce (for an exception see LeBel, Burnett, Maruna, & Bushway,…”
The Role of Transformation Narratives in Desistance Among Released Lifers (2014, background): “…instead, has argued for an institutionalization of the redemption ritual as a necessary part of successful re-entry; by being rewarded for participation in programs and by re-entry courts recognizing redemption (Maruna & LeBel, 2002), offenders would feel recognized in their efforts to change.”
An Examination of the Impact of Formerly Incarcerated Persons Helping others (2007, methodology): “of strengths-based corrections approach (see Maruna & LeBel, 2003 ), like the New Careers”
Examining the process of offender change: the transition to crime desistance (2009, background): “Moreover, there is a measure of disbelief within the research community regarding whether offenders ever truly cease antisocial behaviour (Maruna & LeBel, 2003 ; Osborn & West, 1980 ).”