Positive and Negative Developmental Trajectories in U.S. Adolescents: Where the Positive Youth Development Perspective Meets the Deficit Model

By Stacy M. Zimmerman, E. Phelps, R. Lerner. 2008

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b70dd5bc5548adc92a5f61f2316f517f197f3b13

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kristina L. Schmid
2. Michelle J. Boyd
3. R. Lerner
4. E. Aardal
5. J. Geldhof
6. T. Larsen
7. I. Holsen
8. E. Phelps

In Safety Research

1. Kristina L. Schmid
2. Michelle J. Boyd
3. E. Phelps
4. C. Napolitano
5. R. Lerner
6. I. Holsen
7. E. Aardal
8. J. Geldhof

In Social Psychology

1. Kristina L. Schmid
2. Michelle J. Boyd
3. C. Napolitano
4. R. Lerner
5. E. Phelps
6. I. Holsen
7. J. Lerner
8. Edmond P. Bowers

Citations in the corpus

• The five Cs of positive youth development in Norway (2017, background): “Supported by findings from Zimmerman, Phelps, and Lerner (2008) and Phelps and colleagues (2009), research indicates that different trajectories of PYD and problem behaviors are intertwined in diverse ways across adolescence.”
• The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: Findings from the 4-H Study of Positive Youth Development (2011, background): “, 2007) and four waves of data (Zimmerman et al., 2008), beginning in Grade 5.”