Implementation research: state of the art and future directions

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Service innovation implementation: a systematic review and research agenda (2020, background): “It is the crucial link between the decision to adopt the innovation and the routine use of service innovation (Baradarani & Kilic, 2018; Dube, 2018; Linton, 2002).”
Mapping the benefits and costs associated with process innovation: The case of RFID adoption (2011, methodology): “One reason for this approach is that the focus of implementation studies tends to be on identifying “success factors” associated with effective implementation rather than on identifying what “success” represents (Klein and Sorra, 1996; Linton, 2002; Meyer et al., 1999; Repenning, 2002).”
How do large multinational companies implement open innovation (2011, background): “This has resulted in a rather uniform approach across the conscious implementers of the first quadrant, who seemed to have moved towards the OI implementation with a very centralized approach, following the ‘success factors’ previously identified by the innovation implementation literature (Linton, ”
Towards a general theory of implementation (2013, background): “Implementation subsumes all related activities from initiation to incorporation [37], and it may lead to the routine incorporation of ensembles of practice in everyday work [38,39].”