The Interface of Language, Vision, and Action: Eye Movements and the Visual World
By J. Henderson, Fernanda Ferreira. 2004
226 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b66189b22dd1ae613fa3b473686d97728a04208b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Jeremy M. Wolfe
- Daniel Mirman
- Monica S. Castelhano
- J. Dixon
- Michael Dorr
- James R. Brockmole
- Michael L. Mack
- Jesse Snedeker
Citations in the corpus
- Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences (2008, methodology): “1 The VWP has been applied to many more aspects of language processing; for a sense of the range, see the examples collected in Trueswell and Tanenhaus (2005) and Henderson and Ferreira (2004).”
- Constraints on the search for visual information in sport (2004, background): “Another rich vein of information is provided by “episodic scene” knowledge (Henderson & Ferreira, 2004).”
- Variability of eye movements when viewing dynamic natural scenes. (2010, background): “Some authors have argued that the direct contribution of low-level saliency to the choice of fixation targets decreases with viewing time (Itti, 2006; Parkhurst et al., 2002), while others, e.g., Tatler et al. (2005), argue that only the top-down strategy changes (that picks targets from a low-level”
- VISUAL SALIENCY DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR EYE MOVEMENTS DURING VISUAL SEARCH IN REAL-WORLD SCENES (2007, background): “Henderson and Ferreira (2004a) sorted the knowledge available to the human gaze control system into several general categories.”
- Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: the role of global features in object search. (2006, background): “…also shown that with natural scenes and other complex stimuli (such as reading), the cost of moving the eyes to shift attention is less than to shift attention covertly, and led some to posit that studying covert and overt attention as separate processes in these cases is misguided (Findlay, 2004).”
- Syntactic priming during language comprehension in three- and four-year-old children (2008, background): “Because eye movements are influenced by factors other than the ones manipulated (e.g., visual salience, name frequency, see Henderson & Ferreira, 2004 for discussion), looks to one of the two items (animal or object) may be higher than looks to the other irrespective of the experimental condition.”
- The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements (2007, background): “Scenes, just as in their studies, thus were Ersatz scenes rather than real-world environments (see Henderson & Ferreira, 2004, for a discussion on different types of scenes).”