Beyond Brainstorming: Effects of Different Group Procedures on Selection of Ideas and Satisfaction with the Process

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question (2010, methodology): “began to focus on groups’ efficacy in recognizing and selecting good ideas as an important determinant of their performance (Faure, 2004; Putman & Paulus, in press; Rietzschel et al., 2006, 2010).”
Identifying Quality, Novel, and Creative Ideas: Constructs and Scales for Idea Evaluation (2006, background): “Others focus on effectiveness: how well the idea dealt with the problem (Eisenberger and Roades, 2001), its effectiveness (Kramer and Kuo, 1997; Barki and Pinsonneault, 2001; Faure, 2004), and its ability to solve the problem (Valacich et al., 1995).”
Creativity: The Role of Unconscious Processes in Idea Generation and Idea Selection. (2012, background): “Several good efforts have been made to gain more insight into how individuals (Rietzschel, Nijstad, & Stroebe, 2010; Runco & Smith, 1992), groups (Faure, 2004), and eminent creators (Kozbelt, 2007) select ideas; however, research on idea generation has overshadowed the question of idea evaluation.”
Effects of Problem Scope and Creativity Instructions on Idea Generation and Selection (2014, background): “Faure (2004) found that nominal brainstorming groups, although more productive than interactive groups, selected ideas of similar quality. Rietzschel et al. (2006) also failed to find significant differences in the quality of ideas selected by interactive and nominal groups, despite the large differ”