The Potential Distribution of Zebra Mussels in the United States

By John M. Drake, J. Bossenbroek. 2004

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d1700bdb7cc2d3ef53d45d4f4dd81e737f2413

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Modelling ecological niches with support vector machines (2006, methodology): “…are numerous, including forecasting species’ range shifts from climate change (Thomas et al. 2004) and invasion by introduced species (Peterson 2003; Drake & Bossenbroek 2004), testing evolutionary hypotheses (Graham et al. 2004), identifying reservoirs for disease (Peterson et al. 2002), and…”
A calcium‐based invasion risk assessment for zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp) (2008, methodology): “The calcium classifications are consistent with the fact that most of New England, the Piedmont, and Coastal Plains ecoregions along the Atlantic, and much of the southeast have not been invaded by zebra mussel, despite nearby source populations, and apparently appropriate climate, geology, and topo”
Pandora's Box Contained Bait : The Global Problem of Introduced Earthworms (2008, methodology): “…decades have seen rapid advances in computational methods for habitat modeling, including the Genetic Algorithm for Rule Set Production [GARP (e.g., Drake & Bossenbroek 2004)], maximum entropy methods (Phillips et al. 2006), and a wide range of statistical and machine learning methods (e.g.,…”
Will climate change promote future invasions? (2013, background): “…strong correlations between spatial patterns and climatic variables (Jocque et al., 2010), mostly temperature and the availability of water, and have used species distributions models to successfully predict the distribution of fishes (McNyset, 2005) and mussels (Drake & Bossenbroek, 2004).”
Potential range of the invasive fish rotan (Perccottus glenii) in the Holarctic (2011, background): “Studying invasive species for which there are extensive datasets on distribution within both native and invaded parts of their range may be extremely useful to assess whether SDMs based on large-scale environmental layers can be successfully used for freshwater species (Drake and Bossenbroek 2004).”
Potential habitat distribution for the freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US (2009, background): “Most of the studies on aquatic species distribution have used only one modeling approach (eg Drake and Bossenbroek 2004).”
Allee Effects, Propagule Pressure and the Probability of Establishment: Risk Analysis for Biological Invasions (2006, background): “Clearly, the availability of suitable habitat is a prerequisite for population establishment, reflected in much recent work in ‘environmentmatching’ (e.g., Peterson and Vieglas 2001; Reichard 2001; Kolar and Lodge 2002; Sutherst 2003; Drake and Bossenbroek 2004).”
A paradox of trout invasions in North America (2008, background): “…(Bromus tectorum) that has invaded grasslands throughout the western US (Mack 1981), and zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha; Kraft and Johnson 2000; Drake and Bossenbroek 2004) and rusty crayfish (Orconectes rusticus; Olden et al. 2006) that are invading even pristine lakes with intact native…”
A management framework for preventing the secondary spread of aquatic invasive species (2008, background): “Though this approach is useful for scoping the potential distribution of aquatic invasive species at broad spatial scales, it has not yet proven applicable for assessing suitability of specific sites (Drake and Bossenbroek 2004).”
Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. (2006, methodology): “Environmental matching is also possible for aquatic environments (Drake and Bossenbroek 2004, Marchetti et al. 2004a), but currently less tractable than for terrestrial habitats because: (1) fewer aquatic physicochemical data are available in appropriate electronic formats, and fewer distribution…”
Twenty years of zebra mussels: lessons from the mollusk that made headlines (2009, background): “Models of the potential range predict that zebra mussels will spread much further across North America (Strayer 1991; Drake and Bossenbroek 2004; Whittier et al. 2008), but, ultimately, they will be limited by extreme temperatures (both warm and cold) and inadequate calcium concentrations.”
Take a risk: Preferring prevention over control of biological invaders (2007, background): “…technology of invasion forecasting has improved dramatically in recent years (Daehler and Carino, 2000; Clark et al., 2001; Leung et al., 2002; Kolar and Lodge, 2001, 2002; Drake and Bossenbroek, 2004; Rejmanek et al., 2005), but has not yet been strongly incorporated into management and policy.”
Poor Growth of Rainbow Trout Fed New Zealand Mud Snails Potamopyrgus antipodarum (2008, background): “Future research to assess the effects of NZMSs on native communities include (1) determining the potential distribution of NZMSs in North America (sensu Drake and Bossenbroek 2004 ) to better identify regions with high potential for invasion and to allow for more focused public awareness programs, ”
Patterns and Pathways in the Post-Establishment Spread of Non-Indigenous Aquatic Species: The Slowing Invasion of North American Inland Lakes by the Zebra Mussel (2006, background): “…all lakes that (1) were 25 ha because zebra mussels are not usually found in smaller lakes, (2) were predicted to be environmentally unsuitable (Drake and Bossenbroek 2004) and thus unlikely to support populations, or (3) had navigable connections to the Great Lakes or connecting waterways…”
Long‐term demography of a zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) population (2006, background): “Since 1800, this species has spread over most of western Europe and eastern North America, and continues to expand its range (Kinzelbach, 1992; Drake & Bossenbroek, 2004).”