Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management.

By David M. Lodge, Susan L. Williams, H. MacIsaac, Keith R. Hayes, B. Leung, S. Reichard, R. N. Mack, Peter B. Moyle, Maggie B. Smith, D. Andow and 2 more. Ecological Applications, 2006

975 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04a0a9b35663a1103558bc371bec4867850de9da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Species Invasions from Commerce in Live Aquatic Organisms: Problems and Possible Solutions (2007, background): “428 BioScience • May 2007 / Vol. 57 No. 5 www.biosciencemag.org Intentional introductions of nonindigenous species proceed on a worldwide scale with little voluntary or regulatory screening to reduce introductions of harmful species (Lodge et al. 2006).”
“Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA (2011, background): “In the absence of tools to detect rare species, uncertainty about when, where, and for how long a management action should be implemented often results in inaction or ineffective use of management resources (Thompson 2004; Lodge et al. 2006).”
Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Aquatic Invasive Species (2008, background): “A rich body of literature documents the widespread invasion of nonnative species and their impacts in aquatic systems (e.g., Strayer 1999; Lodge et al. 2006; Stromberg et al. 2007).”
The Role of Propagule Pressure in Biological Invasions (2009, methodology): “Diffusion models have been used with some success to model spread of established invaders (reviewed by Lockwood et al. 2007).”
A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species' traits and environment (2012, background): “Such a synthesis is essential in the face of the increasing frequency and magnitude of plant introductions and the mounting pressure on policymakers to regulate and mitigate this component of global change (Lodge et al., 2006; Hulme et al., 2009b).”
Introduction and use of non‐native species for aquaculture in China: status, risks and management solutions (2015, background): “In addition, research progress on management of harmful species has accumulated in the past two decades (e.g. Lodge et al. 2006; Messing & Wright 2006).”
Invasion success and impact of an invasive fish, round goby, in Great Lakes tributaries (2013, background): “Invasive species inflict huge economic and ecological costs world-wide (Vitousek et al., 1996; Pimentel et al., 2005; Lodge et al., 2006) in part by altering the composition of communities and reducing ecosystem services (Chapin et al., 2000).”
Non-physical barriers to deter fish movements (2012, background): “A recent estimate of economic damages associated with non-indigenous species within the US totals just under USD$120 billion annually (Pimentel et al. 2005), and this figure continues to grow (Lodge et al. 2006).”
Increasing forest loss worldwide from invasive pests requires new trade regulations (2014, background): “Plant phytosanitary regulations vary by country but share the perspective – based on WTO rules – that until an organism is a genuine threat, no effort is made to restrict its transport or entry (Lodge et al. 2006; Brasier 2008).”
High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities (2013, background): “One of the most important aspects of biodiversity conservation is to manage rare species in communities (Lodge et al. 2006; Darling &Mahon 2011; Jerde et al. 2011).”
Benefits of invasion prevention: Effect of time lags, spread rates, and damage persistence (2015, background): “Although the vast majority of nonnative species are rarely even noticed, a few species have had remarkable impacts that have transformed ecosystem properties, often with severe effects on societal uses of those ecosystems (Aukema et al., 2011; Lodge et al., 2006; Vitousek et al., 1996).”