Poor Growth of Rainbow Trout Fed New Zealand Mud Snails Potamopyrgus antipodarum
By M. Vinson, M. Baker. 2008
109 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a287b5d657ff6b1bc8849e12ea9936439c018af
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- David L. Strayer
- Tina Heger
- Caren S. Goldberg
- Petr Pyšek
- P. Castro-Díez
- Christopher J. Lortie
- L. Waits
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- David L. Strayer
- Christopher J. Lortie
- Tina Heger
- P. Castro-Díez
- S. Haider
- Petr Pyšek
- Lorena Gómez Aparicio
Citations in the corpus
- Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) (2013, background): “Native fish eat mudsnails, but they assimilate very little energy from eating snails and suffer reduced growth rates (Vinson and Baker 2008).”
- What explains the invading success of the aquatic mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (Hydrobiidae, Mollusca)? (2008, background): “Finally, mud snails are also resistant to many native predators, because of its hard shell and solid operculum (Zaranko et al., 1997; Vinson & Baker, 2008).”
- Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining (2012, background): “…vectors, such as fish, waterfowl or fishing tools, due to its ability to survive the passage through the digestive tract (in the case of fish) or to its air exposure tolerance (in the case of waterfowl or fishing tools) (Richards et al. 2004, Alonso and Castro-Díez 2008, Vinson and Baker 2008).”