Chinese Entrepreneurship in a Cultural and Economic Perspective

By A. Zapalska, W. Edwards. 2001

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5d08d4fffe37ee5f157d8553ca1e53bd7ba4554

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Jane K. Miller
2. Chun Guo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jane K. Miller
2. Chun Guo

Citations in the corpus

• Entrepreneurship in Developing Countries (2010, unknown): “In China, although there has been some decentralization of economic activity, government officials interfered in the affairs of “enterprise managers” ([91], p.”
• The Interrelationships Among Informal Institutions, Formal Institutions, and Inward Foreign Direct Investment (2013, unknown): “In addition, tight regulations impose costs on entrepreneurs, thus reducing their incentives and ability to innovate (Begley, Tan, & Schoch, 2005; Zapalska & Edwards, 2001) and depriving the local market of important knowledge resources sought by many foreign investors (Almeida, 1996; Feinberg &…”
• CEO Tenure in Taiwanese Family and Nonfamily Firms: An Agency Theory Perspective (2006, background): “Zapalska and Edwards (2001) also found that there are significant links between Chinese culture and entrepreneurial activities in China.”
• Entrepreneurship in China (2018, unknown): “One of the most important dimensions of informal institutions is associated with China’s culture, which plays a fundamental role in shaping value orientations and entrepreneurs’ cognition (Holt 1997; Busenitz and Lau 2001; Mitchell et al. 2002; Zapalska and Edwards 2001).”
• Guanxi Dynamics and Entrepreneurial Firm Creation and Development in China (2010, background): “In the transition from a centrally planned to a socialist market economy, China has experienced the emergence and prosperity of entrepreneurial activities in the last two decades (Zapalska & Edwards, 2001).”