Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape

By M. Jolink. 2014

380 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b5a7be9b703ae34e0d79703025b6ddb5f35e7221

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Introduction - Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age (2018, background): “Direct interactions between producers and consumers outside of the platform, can harm the platform’s economic interests (Rochet and Tirole 2003, 2006), motivating platforms to control these forms of interactions.”
How are Practices Made to Vary? Managing Practice Adaptation in a Multinational Corporation (2014, unknown): “Finally, while open innovation has often been celebrated (e.g. Chesbrough, 2006), too much openness hurts performance (Laursen & Salter, 2006).”
Open Innovation 4.0 as an Enhancer of Sustainable Innovation Ecosystems (2020, background): “In accordance to Chesbrough [82], the empirical evidence proves the need for addressing the intellectual property issues under the open innovation mindset, to meet the singularities of the innovation types and the changes brought by the cooperative innovation processes.”
Learning from openness: The dynamics of breadth in external innovation linkages (2014, background): “Although the open innovation paradigm, at least implicitly, deals with openness through time (Chesbrough, 2006), most empirical studies rely on cross-sectional data 6 These estimations are available on request. to examine the link between openness and innovation.”
Patent Management in Entrepreneurial SMEs: A Literature Review and an Empirical Study of Innovation Appropriation, Patent Propensity, and Motives (2013, unknown): “…patents as enablers of open innovation in order to connect their technological innovations with the complementary assets needed for commercialization (e.g., Chesbrough, 2003, 2006; Chesbrough et al., 2006; Enkel et al., 2009; Gassmann et al., 2009; Dahlander and Gann, 2010; Bogers et al., 2012).”
Open for Ideation: Individual-level Openness and Idea Generation in R&D (2012, background): “Despite the move toward open innovation, large R&D organizations are extremely focused on the creation and protection of IP, which can have a significant impact on how they engage with external sources (Alexy, Criscuolo, and Salter, 2009; Chesbrough, 2006).”
Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation (2014, unknown): “In contrast to earlier research, “Open Innovation is a paradigm that assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas . . . as they look to advance their technology” (Chesbrough, 2006a, p. 1).”
Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises (2012, unknown): “Based on extant literature, we suggest that large enterprises make more use of OI practices than SMEs (Batterink 2009; Chesbrough 2003a).”
Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis (2012, unknown): “In other words, OI strives to come up with the best ideas and the most suitable business models for commercialisation [49,82].”
Linking information systems and entrepreneurship: A review and agenda for IT‐associated and digital entrepreneurship research (2018, background): “In the extreme form of value co‐creation and innovation, such business models are called open business models (Chesbrough, 2006).”
Managing Distributed Innovation: Strategic Utilization of Open and User Innovation (2012, unknown): “Open innovation has many similarities to the vertically integrated model of industrial innovation, combining with and supplementing the practices and concepts of the integrated model including an emphasis on firm success (Chesbrough, 2006a, 2006b).”
Open innovation: current status and research opportunities (2017, unknown): “The success of open business models is defined by aligning value creation and capture activities to an innovation rather than controlling these activities within the firm (Chesbrough, 2006b; Zott, Amit, & Massa, 2011).”
Evaluation on crowdsourcing research: Current status and future direction (2012, background): “Customer/user integration into innovation activities is regarded as a mode of value creation, and an Open Innovation paradigm was proposed to address the value creation and capture (Chesbrough 2003, 2006a, b).”
Crowdsourcing: A Review and Suggestions for Future Research (2018, unknown): “The same process approach is commonly used when analyzing open innovation (e.g. Chesbrough, 2006) and co-creation (e.g. Greer and Lei, 2012), both of which, it is generally accepted, are at the origin of crowdsourcing.”
- in-Progress (2012, unknown): “" In contrast to " closed innovation " where all innovation happens inside the corporation, " open innovation " involves reaching outside organizational boundaries for new sources of innovation (Chesbrough, 2003, 2006).”