Discrimination of Large and Small Numerosities by Human Infants

By J. Lipton, Elizabeth S. Spelke. 2004

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b50f8adfb0b2531557afabaa768a634341d7a913

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Herbert Roeyers
2. A. Desoete
3. Elizabeth S. Spelke
4. Anne-Emmanuelle Ceulemans
5. Anne Huylebroeck
6. RosaI. Arriaga
7. Fei Xu
8. Katherine D. Kinzler

In Education

1. RosaI. Arriaga
2. Herbert Roeyers
3. Elizabeth S. Spelke
4. Fei Xu
5. Anne-Emmanuelle Ceulemans
6. Anne Huylebroeck
7. Katherine D. Kinzler
8. A. Desoete

In Statistics and Probability

1. Herbert Roeyers
2. Elizabeth S. Spelke
3. RosaI. Arriaga
4. A. Desoete
5. Fei Xu
6. Anne-Emmanuelle Ceulemans
7. Anne Huylebroeck
8. Katherine D. Kinzler

Citations in the corpus

• Core knowledge. (2007, background): “The first view traces back to Enlightenment thinkers such as Locke (1689) and Hume (1748) and has been invigorated more recently by cognitive psychologists and neural network theorists (e.”
• Number discrimination in 10-month-old infants (2007, background): “Several recent studies have focused on large number discrimination in prelinguistic human infants (e.g. Brannon, Abbot, & Lutz, 2004; Lipton & Spelke, 2003, 2005; Xu, 2003a, 2003b; Xu & Spelke, 2000; Xu, Spelke, & Goddard, 2005).”
• Subitizing or counting as possible screening variables for learning disabilities in mathematics education or learning (2009, background): “Researchers suggest two qualitatively different number magnitude processing mechanisms: a fast parallel mechanism for subitizing sets of one, two or three/four objects and a slow serial mechanism for counting larger sets (Lipton & Spelke, 2004; Piazza, Giacomoni, Le Bihan, & Dehaene, 2003).”