INVASIVENESS OF AMMOPHILA ARENARIA: RELEASE FROM SOIL‐BORNE PATHOGENS?
By J. Beckstead, I. Parker. 2003
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cell Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b4e0071f7cef34c3e9531f53155ee2c7eadc93d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cell Biology
- R. Callaway
- W. H. van der Putten
- P. Alpert
- J. Klironomos
- Kurt O. Reinhart
- K. Clay
- A. Agrawal
- J. Maron
In Plant Science
- W. H. van der Putten
- R. Callaway
- Kurt O. Reinhart
- J. Klironomos
- J. Maron
- T. Martijn Bezemer
- James D. Bever
- P. Alpert
Citations in the corpus
- Exotic invasive plant accumulates native soil pathogens which inhibit native plants (2007, background): “Beckstead & Parker (2003) found significant inhibitory effects of soil-borne pathogens, particularly nematodes and fungi, on germination and early growth of invasive Ammophila arenaria . In parallel experiments, Beckstead & Parker (2003) observed a significant growth inhibition of A. arenaria in n”
- A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range (2005, background): “In contrast, Beckstead & Parker (2003) showed that the impacts of soil pathogens on dune grass, Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link, were of equally strong magnitude in the introduced and native range.”
- Invasion of Solidago gigantea in contrasting experimental plant communities: effects on soil microbes, nutrients and plant–soil feedbacks (2010, background): “Negative plant–soil feedbacks have also been reported for other exotic invading plants (Beckstead & Parker 2003; Knevel et al. 2004; Nijjer, Rogers & Siemann 2007), but this is the first report for a Solidago species.”
- Reduced plant–soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives (2007, background): “…pathogens has been shown at local scales (D’Hertefeldt & Van der Putten 1998; Blomqvist et al. 2000; Olff et al. 2000; Van der Stoel & Van der Putten 2006) and at large spatial scales (Beckstead & Parker 2003; Van der Putten et al. 1993; Reinhart et al. 2003; Van der Stoel & Van der Putten 2006).”
- Breaking New Ground: Soil Communities and Exotic Plant Invasion (2005, background): “…/ Vol. 55 No. 6 Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/BioScience on 29 Feb 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use effects on this species (Beckstead and Parker 2003), suggesting that European beachgrass does not escape the negative effects of soil biota in its invasive range.”
- Invasive plants and their escape from root herbivory: a worldwide comparison of the root-feeding nematode communities of the dune grass Ammophila arenaria in natural and introduced ranges (2005, background): “Growth experiments with A. arenaria in South Africa (Knevel et al. 2004) and the USA (Beckstead and Parker 2003) have shown that the soils from these two introduced regions also produce growth-reducing potential even in the absence of feeding-specialist nematodes.”
- An invasive aster (Ageratina adenophora) invades and dominates forest understories in China: altered soil microbial communities facilitate the invader and inhibit natives (2007, result): “Results from other studies also provide support for an underground invasion view that invasive plants suffer fewer negative effects and experience more beneficial mutualism in their exotic ranges than in their native ranges (Beckstead and Parker 2003; Knevel et al. 2004; Reinhart et al. 2005).”
- Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales (2014, background): “…invasive species have been shown for Centaurea stoebe (Callaway et al. 2004a), Acer platanoides and A. negundo (Reinhart & Callaway 2004), Robinia pseudoacacia (Callaway et al. 2011a) and Triadica sebifera (Yang et al. 2013) but not for other species (Beckstead & Parker 2003; Andonian et al. 2011).”
- Biotic interactions and plant invasions. (2006, background): “…2004; Torchin & Mitchell 2004, but see Van der Putten et al. 2005), are less impacted by pathogens and herbivores (DeWalt et al. 2004, but see Beckstead & Parker 2003), and are less negatively impacted by soil organisms (Reinhart & Callaway 2004; Torchin & Mitchell 2004; Wolfe et al. 2005)…”
- A meta‐analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions (2004, background): “Our results are thus consistent with the equivocal evidence for this hypothesis in recent research (Maron & Vilà 2001; Agrawal & Kotanen 2003; Beckstead & Parker 2003; Colautti et al. 2004), and call into question the use of this hypothesis to infer resident species controls over invasion success.”
- ENEMY RELEASE? AN EXPERIMENT WITH CONGENERIC PLANT PAIRS AND DIVERSE ABOVE- AND BELOWGROUND ENEMIES (2005, background): “Although reduced regional diversity of enemies may translate to reduced levels of damage to individual plants, this is not always the case (Maron and Vilà 2001, Wolfe 2002, Agrawal and Kotanen 2003, Beckstead and Parker 2003, Colautti et al. 2004).”
- Soil feedback and pathogen activity in Prunus serotina throughout its native range (2005, background): “Storage for several months before use may also have reduced the virulent effect of the soil community (Beckstead & Parker 2003) and the strength 897 Widespread effects of soil pathogens © 2005 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 93, 890–898 of plant-soil feedback may vary throughout the…”