Soil feedback and pathogen activity in Prunus serotina throughout its native range

By Kurt O. Reinhart, A. Royo, W. H. van der Putten, K. Clay. 2005

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f78ff7ef9cc4eb70af0a082e5b14d064ac7b6a1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Distance- and density-dependent seedling mortality caused by several diseases in eight tree species co-occurring in a temperate forest (2009, background): “Several studies have recently examined the virulence of pathogens beneath parents that more strongly affect seedlings through negative feedback mechanisms or local adaptation, not only in herbaceous and grassland communities (Bever 1994; Bever et al. 1997; Mills and Bever 1998; Lively and Dybdahl 20”
Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. (2007, background): “Several studies have demonstrated that soil communities favor NIPS over native species (Reinhart et al., 2003, 2005; Callaway et al., 2004; Wolfe & Klironomos, 2005).”
Plant–soil interactions in the expansion and native range of a poleward shifting plant species (2010, background): “When only a small number of populations is sampled (Reinhart et al., 2003) the observed differences might be the result of a sampling effect (Reinhart et al., 2005), for example caused by different states of a build-up of soil pathogenicity (van der Putten et al., 1988; Olff et al., 2000; Kardol et…”
Do allelopathic compounds in invasive Solidago canadensis s.l. restrain the native European flora? (2008, background): “These complex biochemical interactions within the soil compartment play an important, yet poorly understood, role in plant invasions (e.g. Reinhart et al. 2005; Levine et al. 2006).”
The invasive shrub Buddleja davidii performs better in its introduced range (2007, background): “…and Distributions, 14, 225–233, Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 231 As argued by the ERH, a competitive advantage may be caused by release from natural enemies, such as pathogens (Reinhart et al., 2005) and specialized herbivores (Maron & Vila, 2001; Keane & Crawley, 2002).”
An invasive aster (Ageratina adenophora) invades and dominates forest understories in China: altered soil microbial communities facilitate the invader and inhibit natives (2007, result): “Results from other studies also provide support for an underground invasion view that invasive plants suffer fewer negative effects and experience more beneficial mutualism in their exotic ranges than in their native ranges (Beckstead and Parker 2003; Knevel et al. 2004; Reinhart et al. 2005).”
Soil biota and invasive plants. (2006, background): “Soil biota can suppress the growth, fecundity, and survival of plants in natural communities (Augspurger & Kelly, 1984; van der Putten et al., 1993; Mills & Bever, 1998; Klironomos, 2002; Hood et al., 2004; Reinhart et al., 2005; Thorpe & Callaway, 2006), and it is logical to assume that escape from”
Invasive plants escape from suppressive soil biota at regional scales (2014, background): “In the non-native range of Europe, where P. serotina forms stands that are roughly 10 times more dense than in North America, soil biota produce positive feedbacks that strongly contrast with negative soil-feedbacks in the native range (Reinhart et al. 2003, 2005).”
The seed microbiome: Origins, interactions, and impacts (2017, background): “…and van der Putten 2013)) or Pythium (e.g., (Mills and Bever 1998; Packer and Clay 2000; Packer and Clay 2003; Packer and Clay 2004; Reinhart and Clay 2009; Reinhart et al. 2010a; Reinhart et al. 2005;Westover and Bever 2001)), even though the infections most likely arose during seed germination.”