A biogeographical approach to plant invasions: the importance of studying exotics in their introduced and native range

By J. Hierro, J. Maron, R. Callaway. 2005

895 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6302c56b9b656d69a5d92a79204e97df8e198910

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Root competition: beyond resource depletion (2006, background): “Moreover, we will have to consider the possibility of co-evolution between plant competitors (Hierro et al. 2005) and between plants and soil organisms (Callaway et al.”
Superior performance and nutrient-use efficiency of invasive plants over non-invasive congeners in a resource-limited environment (2011, background): “Some researchers have looked for answers in competitive or facilitative interactions between the invader and organisms of its host range, including allelopathy, zoochory and release from natural enemies [for reviews, see Shea and Chesson (2002), Hierro et al. (2005)].”
A cross-continental test of the Enemy Release Hypothesis: leaf herbivory on Acer platanoides (L.) is three times lower in North America than in its native Europe (2009, background): “According to the ERH, without regulation by specialist herbivores and other natural enemies in its native range, the invader can increase its distribution and abundance in its non-native range.”
Allelopathy and plant invasions: traditional, congeneric, and bio-geographical approaches (2008, background): “mended as crucial for understanding invasion (Hierro et al. 2005).”
The Research Program of Historical Ecology (2006, background): “Structurally, invasive species are likely to be ruderal (Hierro et al. 2005, Huston 1994) rather than treelike, but there are many exceptions.”
Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions (2008, background): “…were on average 5.1% more severe (more negative) than losses of heterozygosity Box 3 The challenge of making relevant comparisons with source regions There are many key questions in invasion biology that rely on comparisons between the native range and the introduced range (Hierro et al. 2005).”
Seed predation as a barrier to alien conifer invasions (2008, background): “If an exotic species suffers less seed predation in its introduced than in its native range, this can be evidence for enemy release (see Hierro et al. 2005).”
Understanding the establishment success of non-indigenous fishes: lessons from population genetics (2007, background): “Furthermore, invasions appear to be more likely in disturbed native habitats and when empty niches are available (Hierro et al., 2005; Paavola et al., 2005).”
Effects of biological invasions on forest carbon sequestration (2010, background): “Invasive plants can have deeper root systems than resident native species, thus allowing invaders greater access to water or nutrients (Hierro et al., 2005).”
Selection of preadapted populations allowed Senecio inaequidens to invade Central Europe (2008, background): “…may undergo rapid evolutionary divergence in their novel range (e.g. Blossey & Nötzold, 1995; Maron et al ., 2004; Siemann et al ., 2006), and so may the resident species in response to the novel selection pressures imposed by the exotics (Callaway et al ., 2005; Lau, 2006; Strauss et al ., 2006).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, background): “, 1996; Hooper and Vitousek, 1998), leading to more free resources, renders species-poor communities more invasible than species-rich communities (Hierro et al., 2005).”
Challenges, achievements and opportunities in allelopathy research (2005, result): “In contrast to this criticism, the biogeographical approach utilized to study the invasive success of a non-native species is a significant and novel contribution to ecological patterning studies (Hierro et al. 2005).”